ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print May 30, 2007
Eur Respir J 2007, doi:10.1183/09031936.00163306
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/3/487    most recent
09031936.00163306v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCormack, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bowler, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCormack, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bowler, S.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Daily versus weekly azithromycin in cystic fibrosis patients

J. McCormack 1, S. Bell 2, S. Senini 1, K. Walmsley 1, K. Patel 1, C. Wainwright 3, D. Serisier 4, M. Harris 5, S. Bowler 4

1 University of Queensland Department of Medicine & Infectious Diseases, Mater Adult Hospital, South Brisbane, 4101, Queensland, Australia: Fax + 61 738401548 E-mail: jmccorma@mater.org.au
2 Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, 4032, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Australia.
3 Royal Children's Hospital, Herston, 4029, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Queensland, Australia.
4 Adult Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Mater Adult Hospital, South Brisbane, 4101, Queensland, Australia.
5 Mater Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, 4101, Queensland, Australia.


   Abstract

Four randomised placebo controlled trials (RCT) have documented the clinical benefits of azithromycin (AZM) in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. In this study we examined if the beneficial effect of AZM is equivalent when administered daily or weekly.

Our trial was a double-blinded, randomised study of 208 CF patients aged 6-58 years who were assigned to 250mg daily (103) or 1200mg weekly (105) AZM for six months with assessments at baseline and months one, three, six and seven. Patients came from five adult and children's CF centres in Southeast Queensland, Australia.

Equivalence was demonstrated between the two groups with respect to improvements in lung function (FEV1 and FVC), C reactive protein, days spent in hospital, admission rates or nutrition (BMI and z scores) was demonstrated between the two groups (daily and weekly) using 95% confidence intervals with a tolerance interval of +/- 10% In patients less than 18 years old the daily group had significantly better improvements in z scores for height and weight after six months of the study. In children, we found a nutritional advantage for daily administration. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were more common with weekly therapy. Apart from these findings daily and weekly administered AZM demonstrated similar outcomes for CF patients,

Keywords:  Azithromycin, cystic fibrosis, macrolides, Pseudomonas aeruginosa




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Tazumi, Y. Maeda, C. E. Goldsmith, W. A. Coulter, C. Mason, B. C. Millar, M. McCalmont, J. Rendall, J. S. Elborn, M. Matsuda, et al.
Molecular characterization of macrolide resistance determinants [erm(B) and mef(A)] in Streptococcus pneumoniae and viridans group streptococci (VGS) isolated from adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF)
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2009; 64(3): 501 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
B. M. Vanaudenaerde, I. Meyts, R. Vos, N. Geudens, W. De Wever, E. K. Verbeken, D. E. Van Raemdonck, L. J. Dupont, and G. M. Verleden
A dichotomy in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation revealed by azithromycin therapy
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2008; 32(4): 832 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the European Respiratory Society.