ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 13, 2007
Eur Respir J 2007, doi:10.1183/09031936.00143206
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/3/532    most recent
09031936.00143206v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montes, U.
Right arrow Articles by Zulueta, J.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Montes, U.
Right arrow Articles by Zulueta, J.J.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Factors determining early adherence to a lung cancer screening protocol

U. Montes 1, L.M. Seijo 1*, A. Campo 1, A.B. Alcaide 1, G. Bastarrika 2, J.J. Zulueta 1

1 Dept of Pulmonary Medicine, Clínica Universitaria, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
2 Dept of Radiology, Clínica Universitaria, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lmseijo{at}unav.es.


   Abstract

Lung cancer screening using CT is effective in detecting early stage disease. However, concerns regarding adherence have been raised.

We conducted a retrospective observational study of 641 asymptomatic smokers enrolled in our lung cancer screening program between 2000 and 2003. Adherent subjects were compared with non-adherent subjects with regard to lung function, gender, age, motivation for enrollment, smoking status, distance to the referral center, family history of lung cancer, asbestos exposure, education, the presence and type of nodule(s) seen on initial CT, and exposure to a nursing intervention designed to improve adherence.

Overall early adherence to the study protocol was 65%. Multivariate analysis confirmed the importance of gender, proximity to the referral center, the presence of non-calcified nodules, and the nursing intervention as factors conditioning adherence to the study protocol. Patients encouraged to participate in the study were more adherent, as were former smokers. Gender interactions were observed in multivariate analysis. The nursing intervention was significant for women, while abnormal lung function improved male adherence.

Adherence to lung cancer screening is particularly good among women and subjects living near the referral center. Our study suggests the need to develop new strategies, especially those targeting men and subjects with low-risk perception, in order to improve adherence.

Keywords:  Adherence, computer tomography, lung cancer, lung cancer screening







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the European Respiratory Society.