ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zeidler, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tashkin, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zeidler, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tashkin, D. P.
Eur Respir J 2006; 27:307-315
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2006

Montelukast improves regional air-trapping due to small airways obstruction in asthma

M. R. Zeidler1, E. C. Kleerup1, J. G. Goldin2, H. J. Kim2, D. A. Truong2, M. D. Simmons1, J. W. Sayre2, W. Liu3, R. Elashoff3 and D. P. Tashkin1

1 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care Medicine and Hospitalists, 2 Thoracic Radiology Section, Dept of Radiology, and 3 Division of Biomathematics, Dept of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

CORRESPONDENCE: M. R. Zeidler, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care Medicine and Hospitalists, CHS 37-131, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095-1690, USA. Fax: 1 3102065088. E-mail: mzeidler{at}mednet.ucla.edu

Keywords: Methacholine, montelukast, quantitative thoracic computed tomography of asthma, small airways

Received: January 13, 2005
Accepted October 24, 2005


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Quantitative image analysis of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) performed at residual volume, before and after methacholine, is a sensitive method of detecting small airways involvement in asthma and response to therapy targeted to the small airways. Since an oral anti-leukotriene reaches the small airways via the circulation, the present authors hypothesised that treatment with montelukast would lead to improved small airway patency.

A double-blind crossover study compared the effect of montelukast versus placebo for 4 weeks in 16 mild-to-moderate steroid-naïve asthmatics. Small airways function was evaluated by HRCT at residual volume before and after methacholine to assess regional air-trapping and airways hyperresponsiveness, as well as by physiological studies of small airways.

Montelukast treatment resulted in significantly less regional air-trapping on HRCT on the pre-methacholine images when compared with placebo, as well as improvement in total quality of life scores and symptom sub-scores. However, montelukast treatment had no effect on increases in regional air-trapping on HRCT in response to methacholine. No differences were noted in global measures of small airways physiology between placebo and montelukast.

In conclusion, distal airways disease improves in asthmatic subjects treated with montelukast. This improvement can be detected with high-resolution computed tomography, but not with conventional physiological studies.

Small airways disease (airways <2 mm in diameter), long recognised as a component of asthma, has been relatively unexplored due to difficulties in evaluating and treating the peripheral airways. Increased mucous plugging and thickening of the smooth muscle, submucosa and adventitia have been demonstrated in the peripheral airways of patients who died from asthma 1–3. Activated eosinophils and expression of interleukin-5 mRNA are also increased in the distal resected lung of patients with moderate-to-mild asthma 4, 5. Using transbronchial and endobronchial biopsies, more eosinophilic inflammation was documented in the distal lung than in the central airways of nocturnal asthmatics 6. Histopathological data, obtained from autopsies, lung resections and bronchoscopical studies, offer invaluable insight into small airways disease in asthma, but are difficult to obtain and/or expose the patient to potential risks.

Noninvasive small airways physiological studies are easier to perform, but are limited by their test-retest variability and/or lack of specificity in reflecting small airways function. Forced expiratory flow rates at mid-to-low lung volumes exhibit marked variability and may be affected by changes in the large airways and lung volumes 7. Closing volume (CV), believed to be a more specific test for assessing distal lung disease, is limited by large, within-subject and inter-reader variability 8. However, a recent study positively correlated CV with repeated asthma exacerbations 9.

Quantitative image analysis of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) performed at residual volume (RV), before and after bronchoprovocation, identifies regional small airways changes not detectable by physiological measures 10–12. In a comparison of an extra-fine inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) hydrofluoroalkane (HFA; mass median aerodynamic particle size (MMAD) 0.8–1.2µ), with a conventional large particle chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) ICS, BDP-CFC (MMAD 3.5–4.0µ), regional air-trapping decreased after treatment with BDP-HFA, but not with BDP-CFC 13. In contrast, neither of these two treatments led to a significant difference in the luminal size of measured large (>2 mm) airways on HRCT. In addition, no significant difference in RV, functional residual capacity (FRC) or forced mid-expiratory flow at 25–75% of vital capacity (FEF25–75%) was found between the two groups.

The present authors hypothesised that improvement in HRCT lung attenuation and CV would occur in asthmatic subjects treated with montelukast, a systemically administered leukotriene receptor antagonist with anti-inflammatory properties, which would target both proximal and distal airways.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Study design
The study compared oral montelukast and placebo in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. The primary outcome was the change in regional air-trapping assessed by HRCT at RV, before and after methacholine. Secondary outcomes included changes in CV, spirometric indices, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), subdivisions of lung volume, rescue ß-agonist use, asthma symptom and asthma control scores, and quality of life.

After baseline measurements, subjects were randomised to either montelukast 10 mg or an identical-appearing placebo to be taken once daily in the evening. After 4 weeks, subjects crossed over to the alternate treatment. A compliance visit was performed 2 weeks after the initiation of each drug phase (table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1— Study design

 
Subjects
Inclusion criteria were: 1) aged 18–65 yrs; 2) no use of ICS in the prior 2 months; 3) forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) ≥60 % predicted 14; 4) provocative dose causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) ≤4 mg·mL–1; and 5) clinical diagnosis of asthma. Exclusion criteria are listed in table 2Go. Females of childbearing age were instructed to use appropriate birth control measures.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2— Exclusion criteria for entry into the study

 
Subjects were informed of the risks and benefits of the study and signed an informed consent approved by the University of California Medical Human Subjects Protection and Radiation Safety Committees (Los Angeles, CA, USA).

Procedures
Pulmonary function and methacholine inhalation challenge testing
Subjects withheld albuterol 8 h prior to all procedures. Pulmonary function tests, methacholine challenge tests and CV were performed as per published guidelines. Identification of CV was performed visually by two independent readers on separate printouts of the single-breath nitrogen washout curves and averaged.

Functional imaging
The HRCT acquisition technique has been described previously 11, 13.

HRCT data analysis
Anatomically registered 1-mm slices, which were obtained pre- and post-methacholine at baseline (visit three) and after 4 weeks of treatment with either drug (visits six and nine), were selected for the rostral (upper) and caudal (lower) lung zones. Following image quality checks, automated segmentation was performed on each of the acquired slices as previously described 11. Twelve nonoverlapping regions of interest (ROIs) were segmented from the lung portion of the matched slices. The 12 ROIs consisted of right rostral, right caudal, left rostral and left caudal regions, each subdivided into ventral (nondependent), intermediate and dorsal (dependent) sections. The latter three subdivisions mimic the gravity-dependent zones of lung perfusion in supine subjects by West 15. A higher attenuation is expected in the dependent regions due to a relative increase in blood per unit tissue volume. Lung attenuation curves (LACs) representing the cumulative frequency distribution of lung attenuation (Hounsfield units; HU) by pixel were derived for each of the ROIs and the median and 10th percentile attenuation were determined (fig. 1Go). A shift of the LAC to the left (as measured by a more negative median or 10th percentile) represents lower lung attenuation, more air-trapping, and by inference, reduced small airways patency 11. Shifts in lung attenuation after administration of methacholine at baseline and after each treatment arm were also evaluated.


Figure 1
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1— a) High-resolution computed tomography data analysis showing the acquisition of 12 regions of interest (ROIs), consisting of right rostral, right caudal, left rostral and left caudal regions, each subdivided into ventral (nondependent), intermediate and dorsal (dependent) sections. A lung attenuation curve (LAC) is then derived for each ROI. b) LAC representing the cumulative frequency distribution of lung attenuation by pixel. HU: Hounsfield units. –––: before methachloine; – – –: after methacholine.

 
Data analysis
The General Linear Model procedure was used to test for a sequence group effect. According to the planned analysis, if no sequence group effect was noted (F with a corresponding p≥0.05), a mixed model would be used, including a sequence effect, representing the two randomised groups, a period effect, with two levels, and a treatment effect with two levels. Subjects were tested within a sequence group and adjustments were made for baseline values. Alternatively, if a sequence effect was detected (p<0.05), then the data from the first treatment period would be analysed using a two-sample unpaired t-test and the data from the second period would be discarded. Ordinal data from questionnaires and diaries were evaluated using a nonparametric signed rank test. Since the CV as a per cent of the vital capacity (CV/VC) values and per cent predicted distributions were skewed, a Kruskal-Wallis test was used.

Changes in the 10th percentile and median lung attenuations after, compared with before, treatment (i.e. post-treatment with placebo minus baseline or with montelukast minus baseline) were calculated from both the pre-methacholine and post-methacholine LACs, separately, as well as from the difference between the pre- and post-methacholine curves (i.e. the shift in the curves in response to methacholine).


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
A total of 27 subjects were enrolled in the trial. Seven of these withdrew during the run-in period, of whom three were noncompliant with appointments, two had scheduling conflicts due to change in work schedule and jury duty, one had a significant psychiatric history undisclosed at screening and one had claustrophobia and could not complete the baseline computed tomography scan. The 20 remaining subjects were randomised, four of whom withdrew early for the following reasons: two had asthma exacerbations during the study which required prednisone; one was noncompliant with appointments; and one had an increase in migraine headaches (during the first drug phase while on placebo). The remaining 16 subjects completed all nine study visits.

Baseline demographics of the 16 completed subjects are presented in table 3Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3— Baseline demographics#

 
Quantitative image analysis of HRCT
A significant sequence effect was noted in the HRCT analysis. Therefore, the HRCTs were analysed as parallel groups, with eight subjects randomised to montelukast and eight subjects randomised to placebo. Two scans could not be evaluated due to motion artefacts resulting in seven scans per treatment group and 168 evaluable ROIs. Baseline HRCT findings (table 4Go) indicate significantly more air-trapping (lower median and 10th percentile lung attenuation before methacholine) in the montelukast group compared with the placebo group (p = 0.0001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 4— Lung attenuation values at baseline and change from baseline after 4 weeks of either montelukast or placebo

 
Small but consistent and statistically significant increases in regional lung attenuation (pre-methacholine) were noted after treatment in individuals randomised to montelukast compared with baseline (p<0.0001; table 4Go; figs 2Go and 3Go). These findings imply reduced air-trapping after 4 weeks of treatment with montelukast, probably due to improved small airways patency. In contrast, the placebo group showed a decrease in regional lung attenuation (pre-methacholine) after treatment, indicating an increase in air-trapping (p<0.0002). The difference between montelukast and placebo was statistically significant (p<0.0001).


Figure 2
View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2— High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images of an individual subject all obtained before a methacholine challenge at: a) baseline; b) after 4 weeks of treatment with montelukast; and c) after 4 weeks of placebo treatment. d, e, f) Matched HRCT images from the same subject at corresponding time points after a methacholine challenge.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3— Quantitative image analysis. a) Lung attenuation curves (LACs) before methacholine challenge at baseline (–––) and after 4 weeks of montelukast (----) or placebo (·····). After treatment, the shift in the LAC to the right from the baseline curve is apparent after montelukast, which carried over into the subsequent placebo phase of the trial. b) LACs after methacholine challenge at baseline (–––) and after 4 weeks of either montelukast (----) or placebo treatment (·····). A small but similar shift from the baseline post-methacholine LAC is noted after montelukast and placebo, indicating persistent regional hyperresponsiveness to methacholine throughout each treatment phase. c, d, e) LACs before (–––) and after (·····) methacholine which were derived at baseline and after 4 weeks of montelukast or placebo, respectively. HU: Hounsfield units.

 
Prior to treatment, administration of methacholine resulted in significant regional air-trapping on HRCT at RV in both treatment groups (table 4Go). One (10th percentile per cent change) of four measures of methacholine response was greater in the placebo than the montelukast group at baseline (p = 0.0379). Treatment with montelukast did not lead to any reduction in the degree of air-trapping after methacholine (p>0.25). In contrast, treatment with placebo resulted in a slight but significant decrease in airway responsiveness to methacholine (p<0.026). This finding was associated with a significant difference (in three out of four measures of methacholine response) between the placebo and montelukast treatment groups (p<0.04). No difference was seen in the change in FEV1, PC20 or the fall in FEV1 after a fixed methacholine dose following treatment with either montelukast or placebo, nor were the differences between the two groups significant (table 5Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 5— Spirometry, methacholine challenge and lung volume values at baseline and change from baseline after 4 weeks of either montelukast or placebo#

 
Comparing the baseline and post-treatment scans before methacholine in the placebo group, the anatomically paired ROIs correlated better with one another (intraclass correlation (ICC) 0.87; 95% CI 0.83–0.90; p = 0.02) than the contralaterally paired ROIs (ICC 0.83; 95% CI 0.77–0.88) and far better than randomly paired ROIs (ICC 0.55; 95% CI 0.34–0.76). These findings are consistent with a heterogeneous distribution of air-trapping within the lung.

Physiological studies
Results of the physiological studies, including baseline values, are shown in table 5Go. No sequence effect was noted for the results of these studies and the data were analysed using the mixed model. FEV1 showed improvement in the montelukast groups that approached statistical significance compared with placebo (p = 0.0525). However, none of the physiological measures of small airways disease (FEF25–75%, RV, RV/total lung capacity, FRC or CV/VC) showed any significant change from baseline after treatment with either placebo or montelukast. Analysis of the impact of treatment on CV was markedly limited since only 77 out of 119 measures had a detectable inflection point. Of the 16 subjects, two had no inflection point in all three studies, one subject had no inflection point in two studies, and seven subjects had no inflection point in one study.

Subject-reported outcomes
Improvements in the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire overall score and symptom sub-scores were statistically significant in favour of montelukast 18. Changes in several other subject-reported outcome variables were numerically, but not statistically, more favourable with montelukast than placebo (table 6Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 6— Subject-reported outcomes at baseline and change from baseline after 4 weeks of either montelukast or placebo#

 
Correlation of results
A positive correlation was found between improvement in lung attenuation pre-methacholine (shift in the 10th percentile or median) and improvement in the overall mini quality of life score (median HU: r = 0.771, p<0.0013; 10th percentile HU: r = 0.763; p<0.0015) and the symptom sub-scores (median HU: r = 0.539; p<0.0466; 10th percentile HU: r = 0.511; p<0.0616) after treatment with montelukast. No changes in any of the measures of small airways physiology correlated with changes in lung attenuation.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Findings from the present study suggest that treatment with a leukotriene receptor antagonist in mild-to-moderate asthmatic subjects has a beneficial effect on small airways patency. However, this effect could only be documented by changes in radiographical features consistent with improvement in small airways function (reduction in regional air-trapping), but not with changes in physiological measures of small airways disease. Conversely, the possibility that these findings might have been influenced by the significantly greater degree of regional air-trapping noted on HRCT at baseline in the montelukast compared with the placebo group cannot be excluded. However, these findings are consistent with previously reported results indicating persistence of RV >150% pred after inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone therapy correlating with the presence of qualitatively assessed low attenuation areas on HRCT even after normalisation of FEV1 and FEF25–75% 21.

The HRCT evidence of decreased air-trapping after treatment with montelukast noted in the present study parallels the previously reported HRCT findings of decreased regional air-trapping after an extra-fine ICS (HFA-BDP), which penetrates the distal lung, compared with a coarse ICS (CFC-BDP), which deposits mainly in the large airways 13. No differences were noted in changes in large (>2 mm–2) airways diameters or FEV1 between the two treatments in the latter study. These observations support the concept that the improvement in air-trapping reflects an effect on small airways function and not an improvement in large airway function.

The beneficial effects observed in the current study with montelukast on regional air-trapping, may reflect the fact that cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLT) are potent bronchoconstrictors and may differentially affect the small airways more than the larger airways. In nonasthmatic lung resection samples, CysLT produced a 30-fold greater bronchoconstriction in small airways (0.5–2 mm internal diameter) than in large airways (3–6 mm) 22. In smaller bronchioles (0.3–0.5 mm internal diameter), leukotriene D4 causes constriction primarily by activating Ca2+ entry via nonvoltage gated channels, possibly by a phosphatidylcholine phospholipase C mediated pathway 23. Montelukast is a potent antagonist of all three CysLT in both small and large excised airways via the CysLT1 receptor subtype 22. In excised small airways (1.5 mm external diameter), passively sensitised with serum from allergic individuals and challenged with grass-pollen extract, an early allergic contractile response was attenuated in only some cases by leukotriene or thromboxane receptor antagonists and almost completely in all individuals by the combination of both types of antagonists 24.

The present authors' failure to observe an improvement in physiological indices of small airways function following montelukast therapy probably reflects the poor sensitivity of these measures in detecting changes due to the large degree of intra-subject test variability 25, 26. The current authors chose to study CV because of previous reports suggesting it to be a sensitive, specific and reproducible physiological indicator of small airways disease 16. In addition, in subjects with brittle asthma it may be a sensitive tool for predicting asthma exacerbations, suggesting that it might serve as a useful marker of chronic untreated distal airways inflammation in these patients 9. However, in the mild asthmatic participants in the present study, while there was good inter-reader agreement of CV interpretation, the single-breath nitrogen washout curves of several subjects did not have a clear inflection point at various times in the study and some subjects were unable to produce acceptable and reproducible curves, even after multiple attempts.

The authors believe that global physiological tests may be an insensitive marker of changes in small airways pathology in asthma due, at least in part, to the heterogeneous regional involvement of small airways that may be detected more readily by radiographical imaging techniques. Quantitative analysis of individual HRCTs, before and after methacholine challenge, clearly showed that not all analysed lung segments in any given subject had small airways abnormalities. This inhomogeneous pattern of small airways involvement may explain why global studies of airway physiology may not adequately reflect the magnitude of changes in the small airways.

The heterogeneity as well as the subtlety of small airways air-trapping may also explain why qualitative radiographical techniques may not be adequate to assess distal lung disease. Initial qualitative radiographic techniques, utilised for the evaluation of air-trapping in obstructive pulmonary disease, were confounded by marked intra- and inter-reader variability (e.g. Kappa Statistic: 0.60–0.79 and 0.40–0.64, respectively), yielding conflicting results 27. Computer-derived quantitative image analysis of HRCT is necessary for reliable detection and quantitation of air-trapping due to small airways disease differences that may be indistinguishable to the eye.

The lack of clearly significant spirometric improvement in response to montelukast, in comparison with placebo, in the current study is not surprising in light of the mild severity of asthma and the small number of subjects studied. The 6.9±12.4% pred FEV1 response noted after montelukast compared with placebo is comparable to findings from other studies, which showed improvements of ~7% pred from baseline 28–30. The 6.5% pred improvement in FEF25–75% did not reach statistical significance, but agrees well with an 8% pred response seen in a prior study 28.

In the present study, the use of montelukast did not reduce hyperresponsiveness to methacholine either globally as assessed by decline in FEV1 or regionally as indicated by the lack of any impact on the leftward shift (in the direction of lower attenuation) of the LAC. This finding contrasts with a small but statistically significant improvement in regional methacholine responsiveness in the placebo group. The latter might be attributable to the deterioration in pre-methacholine lung attenuation following placebo treatment, a "floor effect" (i.e. subjects may have reached near maximal air-trapping prior to methacholine administration, leaving little room for further air-trapping in response to bronchoprovocation).

The lack of improvement in airway reactivity measured by FEV1 after treatment with montelukast is consistent with most but not all of the published literature. An increase of only 0.45 doubling concentrations was seen with montelukast compared with 0.14 for placebo (p = 0.16) 31, and an increase of 1.5 (95% CI: 1.0–2.3) doubling doses was seen with montelukast compared with 1.7 (95% CI: 1.1–2.5) with low-dose HFA triamcinolone 32.

The current finding of a significant improvement in the Quality of Life Questionnaire scores (overall and symptoms), in the absence of any significant change in global physiological measures, could be a reflection of improved distal airways air-trapping, as detected by the imaging studies. Prior studies of montelukast have also shown improvements in asthma quality of life, often without dramatic FEV1 changes 33, 34.

In conclusion, using quantitative lung imaging techniques, the present study demonstrated a reduction in regional air-trapping (most likely due to increased small airways patency), but no reduction in regional hyperreactivity to methacholine (increased air-trapping due to methacholine-induced constriction of small airways) after treatment with an oral leukotriene receptor antagonist. Further studies, including histopathological, immunohistological and patient-reported clinical end-points, in larger samples of asthmatic subjects are needed to determine the biological and clinical significance of these findings.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
 
The authors would like to thank: J. Plocky and C. Lee as study coordinators; E. Lee and R. Ferrill as pulmonary function technicians; and S. Tam for additional help in image analysis.


   FOOTNOTES
 
For editorial comments see page 250. Back


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Saetta M, Di Stefano A, Rosina C, Thiene G, Fabbri LM. Quantitative structural analysis of peripheral airways and arteries in sudden fatal asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;143:138–143.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Kuwano K, Bosken CH, Pare PD, Bai TR, Wiggs BR, Hogg JC. Small airways dimensions in asthma and in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;148:1220–1225.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Carroll N, Elliot J, Morton A, James A. The structure of large and small airways in nonfatal and fatal asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;147:405–410.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Hamid Q, Song Y, Kotsimbos TC, et al. Inflammation of small airways in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;100:44–51.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Minshall EM, Hogg JC, Hamid QA. Cytokine mRNA expression in asthma is not restricted to the large airways. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998;101:386–390.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Kraft M, Djukanovic R, Wilson S, Holgate ST, Martin RJ. Alveolar tissue inflammation in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:1505–1510.[Abstract]
  7. Sherter CB, Connolly JJ, Schilder DP. The significance of volume-adjusting the maximal midexpiratory flow in assessing the response to a bronchodilator drug. Chest 1978;73:568–571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. McFadden ER Jr, Holmes B, Kiker R. Variability of closing volume measurements in normal man. Am Rev Respir Dis 1975;111:135–140.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. in 't Veen JC, Beekman AJ, Bel EH, Sterk PJ. Recurrent exacerbations in severe asthma are associated with enhanced airway closure during stable episodes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:1902–1906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. McNitt-Gray MF, Goldin JG, Johnson TD, Tashkin DP, Aberle DR. Development and testing of image-processing methods for the quantitative assessment of airway hyperresponsiveness from high-resolution CT images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:939–947.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Goldin JG, McNitt-Gray MF, Sorenson SM, et al. Airway hyperreactivity: assessment with helical thin-section CT. Radiology 1998;208:321–329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Newman KB, Lynch DA, Newman LS, Ellegood D, Newell JD Jr. Quantitative computed tomography detects air trapping due to asthma. Chest 1994;106:105–109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Goldin JG, Tashkin DP, Kleerup EC, et al. Comparative effects of hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate inhalation on small airways: assessment with functional helical thin-section computed tomography. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;104:S258–S267.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:179–187.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. West JB. State of the art: ventilation-perfusion relationships. Am Rev Respir Dis 1977;116:919–943.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Buist AS, Ross BB. Closing volume as a simple, sensitive test for the detection of peripheral airway disease. Chest 1973;63:29S–30S.
  17. Crapo RO, Morris AH, Clayton PD, Nixon CR. Lung volumes in healthy nonsmoking adults. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1982;18:419–425.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Juniper EF, Buist AS, Cox FM, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Validation of a standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Chest 1999;115:1265–1270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Revicki DA, Leidy NK, Brennan-Diemer F, Sorensen S, Togias A. Integrating patient preferences into health outcomes assessment: the multiattribute Asthma Symptom Utility Index. Chest 1998;114:998–1007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Juniper EF, O'Byrne PM, Guyatt GH, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control. Eur Respir J 1999;14:902–907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Pifferi M, Caramella D, Ragazzo V, Pietrobelli A, Boner AL. Low-density areas on high-resolution computed tomograms in chronic pediatric asthma. J Pediatr 2002;141:104–108.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Mechiche H, Naline E, Candenas L, et al. Effects of cysteinyl leukotrienes in small human bronchus and antagonist activity of montelukast and its metabolites. Clin Exp Allergy 2003;33:887–894.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Snetkov VA, Hapgood KJ, McVicker CG, Lee TH, Ward JP. Mechanisms of leukotriene D4-induced constriction in human small bronchioles. Br J Pharmacol 2001;133:243–252.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Wohlsen A, Martin C, Vollmer E, et al. The early allergic response in small airways of human precision-cut lung slices. Eur Respir J 2003;21:1024–1032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Bjermer L. History and future perspectives of treating asthma as a systemic and small airways disease. Respir Med 2001;95:703–719.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Tashkin DP, Goldin JG, Kleerup EC. Evaluation of small airways and the impact of inhaled steroids–size does matter. In: Wenzel SE, ed. Asthma and the Small Airways. New York, American Thoracic Society, 2000; pp. 7–15
  27. Grenier P, Mourey-Gerosa I, Benali K, et al. Abnormalities of the airways and lung parenchyma in asthmatics: CT observations in 50 patients and inter- and intraobserver variability. Eur Radiol 1996;6:199–206.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Currie GP, Lee DK, Haggart K, Bates CE, Lipworth BJ. Effects of montelukast on surrogate inflammatory markers in corticosteroid-treated patients with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:1232–1238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Baumgartner RA, Martinez G, Edelman JM, et al. Distribution of therapeutic response in asthma control between oral montelukast and inhaled beclomethasone. Eur Respir J 2003;21:123–128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Israel E, Chervinsky PS, Friedman B, et al. Effects of montelukast and beclomethasone on airway function and asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;110:847–854.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Leff JA, Busse WW, Pearlman D, et al. Montelukast, a leukotriene-receptor antagonist, for the treatment of mild asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. N Engl J Med 1998;339:147–152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Dempsey OJ, Kennedy G, Lipworth BJ. Comparative efficacy and anti-inflammatory profile of once-daily therapy with leukotriene antagonist or low-dose inhaled corticosteroid in patients with mild persistent asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;109:68–74.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Riccioni G, Ballone E, D'Orazio N, et al. Effectiveness of montelukast versus budesonide on quality of life and bronchial reactivity in subjects with mild-persistent asthma. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2002;15:149–155.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Malmstrom K, Rodriguez-Gomez G, Guerra J, et al. Oral montelukast, inhaled beclomethasone, and placebo for chronic asthma. A randomized, controlled trial. Montelukast/Beclomethasone Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:487–495.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
H. O. Coxson and S. Lam
Quantitative Assessment of the Airway Wall Using Computed Tomography and Optical Coherence Tomography
Proceedings of the ATS, August 15, 2009; 6(5): 439 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ERRHome page
P-R. Burgel, J. de Blic, P. Chanez, C. Delacourt, P. Devillier, A. Didier, J-C. Dubus, I. Frachon, G. Garcia, M. Humbert, et al.
Update on the roles of distal airways in asthma
Eur. Respir. Rev., June 1, 2009; 18(112): 80 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
S. Lahzami and G. G. King
Targeting small airways in asthma: the new challenge of inhaled corticosteroid treatment
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2008; 31(6): 1145 - 1147.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
J. Cohen, W. R. Douma, N. H. T. ten Hacken, J. M. Vonk, M. Oudkerk, and D. S. Postma
Ciclesonide improves measures of small airway involvement in asthma
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2008; 31(6): 1213 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. A. Kaminsky, C. G. Irvin, L. K. A. Lundblad, J. Thompson-Figueroa, J. Klein, M. J. Sullivan, F. Flynn, S. Lang, L. Bourassa, S. Burns, et al.
Heterogeneity of bronchoconstriction does not distinguish mild asthmatic subjects from healthy controls when supine
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2008; 104(1): 10 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
G. G. King and C. M. Salome
Multimodality measurements of small airways disease
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2006; 27(2): 250 - 252.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zeidler, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tashkin, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zeidler, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tashkin, D. P.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS