Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2003 Spectral oscillations of RR intervals in sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome patients1 Respiratory Medicine, University of Edinburgh, and 2 Dynesys Ltd, Edinburgh, UK. 3 Sleep Laboratory, Charite, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany CORRESPONDENCE: N.J. Douglas, Respiratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK. Fax: 44 1312421776. E-mail: n.j.douglas@ed.ac.uk Keywords: cardiovascular disease, heart rate variability, sleep apnoea
Received: October 24, 2002
K. Dingli was supported by a Research Fellowship from the European Respiratory Society.
A recent study has shown that daytime heart rate variability is reduced in obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS) patients. In the present study, the hypothesis was that sympathovagal balance around apnoeas/hypopnoeas and nocturnal autonomic activity are altered in OSAHS patients. Frequency- and time-domain analyses of RR intervals were performed to monitor sympathovagal activity noninvasively. Fourteen untreated OSAHS patients and seven healthy subjects underwent overnight polysomnography. Low (LF) and total (TF) frequency power increased 2 min around the end of apnoeas/hypopnoeas (LF 229±38 ms2, TF 345±45 ms2) compared with undisturbed sleep (LF 106±18 ms2, TF 203±23 ms2). The increase in high frequency (HF) power was not significant. LF increase was proportionally higher than the HF increase (normalised LF (LFn) 67±1 units, normalised HF (HFn) 33±1 units) compared with undisturbed sleep (LFn 52±2 units, HFn 48±2 units). RR duration did not change around apnoeas/hypopnoeas (RR 904±28 ms). The LF and TF power increase was greater around arousal-inducing (LF 260±45 ms2, TF 390±65 ms2) compared with self-terminating (LF 161±31 ms2, TF 249±40 ms2) apnoeas/hypopnoeas; the LF and LFn increases were significant in both groups compared with undisturbed sleep and HF power differences were nonsignificant. RR intervals were longer around self-terminating apnoeas/hypopnoeas (RR 914±29 ms); the differences were not significant compared with undisturbed sleep. RR interval spectral power was not influenced by the event type. RR duration decreased (912±28 ms) and LF, HF and TF power increased (LF 111±16 ms2, HF 62±6 ms2, TF 173±21 ms2) across patients, compared with healthy controls (RR 1138±91 ms, LF 57±3 ms2, HF 35±3 ms2, TF 91±6 ms2). LFn and HFn did not change significantly. Sympathetic activity increases around apnoeas/hypopnoeas. The recurrent nocturnal fluctuations of sympathovagal balance and the overall increase of nocturnal autonomic activity may be of importance in the development of cardiovascular disease in sleep apnoea patients. Heart rate variability (HRV), the variation of RR intervals, can be detected through power spectral analysis of RR intervals. The method has been widely validated in physiological and pathological conditions and used as a noninvasive measure of autonomic cardiac control within and between individuals 1, 2. This detection is based on the spectral power changes mainly within the low (LF) and high (HF) frequency bands of the RR intervals. The association of efferent cardiac sympathetic nerve traffic with the increase in LF band power has been demonstrated in different conditions 1, 2 and under application of excitatory and inhibitory pharmacological agents. These studies have shown that changes in LF band power reflect sympathetic cardiac activation, whereas HF band power changes reflect parasympathetic, vagal outflow. The RR spectrum of healthy subjects has been compared with their peripheral sympathetic activity, measured invasively from the peroneal nerve 3, the muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). Although the genesis of the RR interval LF power oscillations is not clear, it has been suggested that these reflect central tonic excitatory sympathetic inputs conditional to brainstem activation 4. This may explain the dissociation found between RR spectral power, RR duration and MSNA under certain conditions, such as apnoeas or hyperventilation 5, and may reflect the common central control mechanisms of respiratory and cardiac autonomic modulations. Hypertension 6 and myocardial infarction 7 cause a reduction in HRV, i.e. an increase in LF and a decrease in total power. These conditions have been associated with the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS) 8, 9. The reduced daytime HRV found in OSAHS patients compared with healthy subjects 10 may be implicated in the development of cardiovascular disorders in these patients. The present study investigated the nocturnal HRV in OSAHS patients through monitoring of the RR interval spectral oscillations and RR duration. The study hypothesis was that apnoeas/hypopnoeas are associated with sympathovagal changes. HRV characteristics around apnoeas/hypopnoeas were compared to baseline, nonevent sleep periods across patients. The patients' RR interval spectral oscillations and RR duration were compared with matched normal controls.
Subjects The polysomnograms of 14 OSAHS patients, (mean±sd) age 51±9 yrs, body mass index (BMI) 29±2 kg·m2, and seven healthy subjects, age 50±10 yrs, BMI 28±2 kg·m2 were analysed. Diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms and polysomnographic outcomes. The controls were matched for age and BMI. All subjects were otherwise healthy; two patients were on the antihypertensive nifedipine. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.
Polysomnography
Scoring/definitions
Postacquisition analysis
The end of apnoeas/hypopnoeas was identified as airflow increase/recovery. To assess the fluctuations in RR interval spectral power induced by apnoeas/hypopnoeas, comparisons were conducted between the same frequency bands within 2-min windows centred around the end of apnoeas/hypopnoeas and 2-min periods of undisturbed sleep. To avoid influence on the RR interval power spectrum through adjacent apnoeas/hypopnoeas or arousals, events were selected for the analysis only when the 2-min window was not overlapping with any further respiratory events, arousals or wake epochs (fig. 1
Signal processing HRV parameters were calculated according to the recommendations specified by the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology 1. All data were processed with program modules from a custom signal processing framework, written in C language for Unix/Linux operating systems.
Careful editing and visual inspection of the ECG signal, sampled at 100 Hz, helped to eliminate sources of errors arising from missing QRS complexes or spurious RR intervals. The RR interval estimation was obtained by using a "second-order derivative with threshold" method. As this time series (tachogram) is a function of number and not of time, RR interval series were converted to a smoothed heart rate time series through sampling at uniform intervals with 4 Hz (
Frequency-domain analysis
Power
Time-domain analysis The mean RR duration of the original tachograms was calculated during the 2-min segments. A decrease in RR duration is a measure of centrally mediated cardiac activation 1, 3. The influence of cortical arousals and event type on these markers was evaluated. To assess the significance of the changes found in RR duration and spectral power across the OSAHS patients, these were compared with healthy subjects. Comparisons were conducted between the whole night recordings of patients versus healthy controls, based on the analysis of nonoverlapping 2-min sliding windows throughout the sleep periods; wake epochs were excluded. A minimum of 1.5 h per subject was analysed. Each subject contributed one data point to the mean of each autonomic marker.
Statistical analysis
The patients' mean sleep efficiency was 88±2% of sleep period time (SPT). The healthy subjects' mean sleep efficiency was 92±3% of SPT (table 1
Across-patient comparison Of the 2,288 scored apnoeas/hypopnoeas, 214 (mean±sem 15±2) fulfilled the "nonoverlap" criteria and were selected foranalysis. These events were compared with 541 (39±8) nonevent periods (baseline sleep). Across the 14 patients, 77±4% of the apnoeas/hypopnoeas analysed occurred during NREM stages 1 and 2 (12±1), 13±3% during SWS (2±1) and 22±4% (4±1) during REM sleep. In eight patients no apnoeas/hypopnoeas were analysed during SWS, in three patients none were analysed during REM sleep. Mean apnoea/hypopnoea duration was 26±4 s.
LFn increased and HFn power decreased 2 min around event termination compared with undisturbed sleep (p<0.001). The increase in absolute LF power (p=0.002) was associated with increase in total power (p=0.01); no significant increase was found in the absolute HF power (p=0.3). Mean RR duration around apnoeas/hypopnoeas did not change compared with undisturbed sleep across patients (p=0.9; table 2
ROC curves, based on the LFn and HFn power values, demonstrated that these spectral power markers of autonomic activity can discriminate well between apnoeas/hypopnoeas and undisturbed sleep, with the areas under the curves being between 0.741.00 (p<0.03) across patients and se between 0.00010.09 (table 3
Cortical arousals, apnoeas versus hypopnoeas Of the 214 apnoeas/hypopnoeas analysed across the 14 patients, 154 (11±1), i.e. 72%, were terminated by visible cortical arousals, and 60 (4±1), i.e. 28%, were nonarousal-inducing apnoeas/hypopnoeas. LF, TF and LFn power were higher (p<0.05), RR duration and HFn power lower (p<0.05) around arousal-inducing compared with self-terminating apnoeas/hypopnoeas (table 4
Of the events, 139, i.e. 65%, were hypopnoeas (10±1) and 75 (5±1), i.e. 35%, were apnoeas. No significant differences were found between apnoeas and hypopnoeas in any of the autonomic markers (p>0.6; table 4
Patients versus healthy subjects
The novel finding of this study is the increase in LF power around apnoeas/hypopnoeas, irrespective of arousal visibility or type of respiratory event. The RR interval analysis throughout the sleep periods, based on 2-min rolling windows, showed a drop in RR duration and an increase in LF, HF and total power across OSAHS patients compared with age- and BMI-matched healthy subjects. The present study was carefully designed to maintain analysis requirements while enabling detection of autonomic activity changes during apnoeas/hypopnoeas and after their termination. To ensure accurate outcomes, only 9% of the scored events were analysed, namely those that were not adjacent to further events, arousals or wake epochs within a 1-min radius from their termination. The outcomes of frequency-domain analysis demonstrate a significant increase in sympathetic activity during and after apnoeas/hypopnoeas compared with periods of undisturbed sleep. This difference could not be demonstrated in the time-domain analysis of the same segments, as the segments analysed included both the bradycardia during the events and the tachycardia following their end, resulting in an overall unchanged mean RR duration around the events compared with undisturbed sleep. These findings demonstrate the superiority of frequency-domain analysis in the detection of autonomic activity changes induced by apnoeas/hypopnoeas. RR duration is influenced by the baroreflex loop, reflects phasic sympathetic activity and interacts with power oscillations during apnoea or hyperventilation 5. The increase in LFn power demonstrates central tonic sympathetic activation 5, 19. This is associated with an increase in respiratory effort due to the inspiratory attempts against the occluded/narrowed airways and the gradual elevation of negative intrathoracic pressure towards the end of apnoeas/hypopnoeas. The haemodynamic consequences are the increased venous return to the right ventricle accompanied by the increased myocardial transmural pressure and a negative chronotrope attitude during the respiratory abnormalities. During the postapnoeic/posthypopnoeic recovery period the intrathoracic pressure decreases towards zero resulting in a decreasing transmural myocardial pressure with a positive ino- and chronotrope effect. This abnormal breathing pattern is associated with increase in sympathetic activity, demonstrated through the increase in RR interval LF power around apnoeas/hypopnoeas and the postapnoeic increase in heart rate and blood pressure 20. The present study shows that the LF power increase around apnoeas/hypopnoeas is irrespective of event type or arousal induction. This is in accordance with previous observations of postapnoeic increase in heart rate and blood pressure in the absence of arousals 21. The present study found that the LF power increase is greater around arousal-inducing apnoeas/hypopnoeas. This was associated with an increase in total power and drop in RR duration. Changes in HF power, although nonsignificant, may have resulted from the apnoea-/hypopnoea- and arousal-related respiratory oscillations. When compared with baseline sleep, sympathetic activity was higher around both the arousal-inducing and self-terminating apnoeas/hypopnoeas. The present outcomes were not validated against MSNA orblood pressure, as their monitoring would disrupt sleep, influence autonomic activity and would not necessarily reflect central tonic sympathetic traffic on the sinus node 5, 19. Some modelling studies suggest that the influence of apnoeas/hypopnoeas on peripheral MSNA may be different to the centrally mediated sympathetic activity. Compared with baseline breathing, MSNA increased during and decreased directly after apnoeas, parallel to the central sympathetically mediated 19 increase in blood pressure and heart rate in healthy awake subjects during 20-s periods 22. Another modelling study on healthy subjects demonstrated dissociated activity patterns between central and peripheral sympathetic activity during voluntary apnoeas and hyperventilation compared with quiet, paced breathing 5. Watanabe et al. 23 studied OSAHS patients during sleep and detected an increase in MSNA, a decrease in blood pressure during apnoeas and a further increase in MSNA and in blood pressure in the immediate postapnoeic period. The finding of an increase in LF power around apnoeas/hypopnoeas compared with quiet sleep, is in agreement with the outcomes of Keyl et al. 24, which were based on 20-min windows.
The present study found a sleep-related reduction in RR duration and an increase in LF, HF and TF power in OSAHS patients compared with age- and BMI-matched controls. The drop in RR duration may represent sympathetic activation. This is in agreement with previous assessments of sympathetic activity using different markers, such as blood pressure and MSNA before and after treatment in OSAHS and compared with healthy controls 25. Daytime HRV in OSAHS patients is reduced compared with healthy subjects 10. A causative link may be speculated between nocturnal and diurnal changes in autonomic activity that results in disturbed circadian sympathovagal balance in these patients. This is in accordance with the findings of Grote et al. 26 who demonstrated reduced vascular response to In the frequency-domain analysis, the present study found an overall increase in total, LF and HF power across patients; the nocturnal increase in HRV was associated with an increase in sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. None of the two branches of autonomic activity dominated across patients compared with healthy controls. This may be due tothe 2-min window used for the analysis, allowing the breathing pattern of OSAHS patients to influence the RR interval power spectrum. Brown et al. 14 demonstrated a strong influence of respiratory rate and tidal volume on the RR interval HF power but not on the RR duration, under experimentally controlled conditions in wake healthy subjects with stable cardiac sympathetic outflow. According to these findings, the presently detected increase in HF power across patients may be the result of the periodically abnormal breathing pattern during the analysis windows. This is supported by the parallel significant drop in RR duration found across patients compared with healthy controls, reflecting the overall increase in sympathetic activity, the detection of which in the frequency-domain analysis is affected by the breathing pattern. The importance of this factor would have been evaluated through elimination of the respiratory oscillations from the RR tachogram, but this was not performed during the present study. Had shorter analysis windows been used to minimise the influence of the breathing pattern on the RR interval power spectrum, these would not have been based on the standards for power spectral analysis 1 and would have required validation against objective markers of autonomic activity, such as MSNA. Potential limitations of the study include definitions, the number of apnoeas/hypopnoeas analysed and the number of subjects studied. The hypopnoea definition presently used, fulfils the ASDA recommendations 11. The inclusion of arousals in the definition may lead to a greater association with arousals compared with other definitions, i.e. based on thoracoabdominal movement or nasal pressure alone. To avoid influence on the RR interval power spectrum through adjacent apnoeas/hypopnoeas, arousals or wake epochs, only 9% of all the scored apnoeas/hypopnoeas were analysed. The distribution of the events analysed was representative of the total events scored, their distribution across the sleep states, the proportion of arousal-inducing events and also the event type. Therefore, the RR power changes around the apnoeas/hypopnoeas analysed are representative of the apnoeas/hypopnoeas scored across the night. Based on the areas under the ROC curves, the differences between apnoeas/hypopnoeas and undisturbed sleep are consistent across the 14 mild-to-severe OSAHS patients. The patients were randomly selected based on their symptoms and polysomnographic findings, typical of the syndrome. The outcomes are therefore likely to be robust and represent clinically important differences. Based on the present findings, the authors speculate that sympathetic enhancement is induced by apnoeas/hypopnoeas during sleep. This reflects the functional overlap of cerebral morphological substrates in the regulation of sleep and autonomic cardiorespiratory function 4. The hypothesis is supported by Zinkovska and Kirby 27 who prevented the increase of central sympathetically mediated vascular resistance 19 in response to airway obstructions, by blocking the autonomic responses to apnoeas through propranolol injection into porcine cerebral ventricles. Further evidence was provided during the observation of patients with autonomic nervous system dysfunction and coexisting sleep apnoea; a "decoupling" of heart rate from the respiratory cycle was noted 28. The present study found increased nocturnal sympathetic activity around apnoeas/hypopnoeas probably linked to increased central tonic efferent traffic in otherwise healthy obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome patients. This suggests an overall increased nocturnal sinus node activity in response to neural modulatory inputs. This is supported by the nocturnal reduction in RR duration across obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome patients. The nocturnal sympathovagal fluctuations may contribute to the previously demonstrated changes in daytime autonomic activity 10. These observations may be of causative and prognostic importance for the development of cardiovascular disease in untreated obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome patients.
The authors would like to thank E. Dolan for secretarial assistance.
For editorial comments see page 870.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||