ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tonnesen, P
Right arrow Articles by Jorgensen, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tonnesen, P
Right arrow Articles by Jorgensen, S
Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 1619-1623
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996


Clinical Trial

Recycling of hard-core smokers with nicotine nasal spray

P Tonnesen, K Mikkelsen, J Norregaard, and S Jorgensen

The primary aim of this smoking cessation study was to evaluate the effect of long-term treatment with nicotine nasal spray in a group of hard-core smokers. A further aim was to compare the effect of ad libitum with fixed dosage of nasal nicotine spray. Eighty nine smokers, failures from two earlier studies with nicotine patches, were enrolled in an open smoking cessation study with nicotine nasal sprays, to be used ad libitum (n=45) or on a fixed schedule of 1 mg x h-1 during the day (n= 44). Carbon monoxide-verified continuous abstinence from smoking beyond Week 2, was 39% at 3 weeks, 12% at 3 months, 10% at 6 months and 6% after 1 yr, with no significant difference in success rate between ad libitum and fixed dosing. Mean daily nicotine dose was 15-16 mg during the first 3 months (range 2-65 mg). Tolerance to local irritating side-effects of nicotine developed during the first weeks of use. Although short-term outcome was promising, the long-term success rate in this group of hardcore smokers was low. Other recycling set-ups are warranted, which might include more aggressive nicotine dosing.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nicotine Tob ResHome page
C. A. Jimenez-Ruiz, M. M. Ulibarri, N. A. Besada, A. C. Guerrero, A. G. Garcia, and A. R. Cuadrado
Progressive reduction using nicotine gum as a prelude to quitting
Nicotine Tob Res, July 1, 2009; 11(7): 847 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. F. Ellerbeck, J. D. Mahnken, A. P. Cupertino, L. S. Cox, K. A. Greiner, L. M. Mussulman, N. Nazir, T. I. Shireman, K. Resnicow, and J. S. Ahluwalia
Effect of Varying Levels of Disease Management on Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Trial
Ann Intern Med, April 7, 2009; 150(7): 437 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
L. C. An, S.-H. Zhu, D. B. Nelson, N. J. Arikian, S. Nugent, M. R. Partin, and A. M. Joseph
Benefits of telephone care over primary care for smoking cessation: a randomized trial.
Arch Intern Med, March 13, 2006; 166(5): 536 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
P. Tonnesen
Essential communication skills in individual smoking cessation
Chronic Respiratory Disease, October 1, 2004; 1(4): 221 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.