ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bridge, P.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bridge, P.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, M
Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 1368-1373
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996


Original Articles

A portable device based on the interrupter technique to measure bronchodilator response in schoolchildren

PD Bridge, H Lee, and M Silverman

A new device for measuring airway resistance following brief airflow interruption (Microlab 4000; Micromedical Ltd, UK) was evaluated in 25 asthmatic school children in comparison with well-established methods. Airway resistance was measured during brief airflow interruption (Rint), before and after administration of salbutamol 200 micrograms by metered-dose inhaler, and in the spirometric parameters, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and peak expiratory flow (PEF), and total respiratory system resistance at 6 Hz (Rrs,6) measured by the forced oscillation technique (FOT). The sensitivity index (SI) (mean change/baseline standard deviation) was calculated for each subject. At baseline, interrupter conductance, the reciprocal of Rint, correlated well with FEV1 (r = 0.837; p < 0.001) and PEF (r = 0.773; p < 0.001), and Rint correlated highly with Rrs,6 (r = 0.942; p < 0.001). The median intrasubject coefficient of variation of the interrupter method was higher than the FOT or either spirometric parameter; Rint 11%, Rrs,6 9%, FEV1 5% and PEF 5%. However, the sensitivity to detect change after bronchodilator, expressed as the median SI, did not differ significantly between measurements: Rint 3.5, Rrs,6 3.6, FEV1 2.4 and PEF 3.0. A significant response (SI > 2) was shown by the interrupter in 22 of the subjects compared with 16 by FEV1. The interrupter technique is useful for assessing changes in airway calibre in asthmatic school children, with a sensitivity at least as good as standard methods. Such a device could be of particular value in those too young to perform spirometry.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
R M J Beelen, H A Smit, R T van Strien, L P Koopman, J E Brussee, B Brunekreef, J Gerritsen, and P J F M Merkus
Short and long term variability of the interrupter technique under field and standardised conditions in 3-6 year old children
Thorax, September 1, 2003; 58(9): 761 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P.J.F.M. Merkus, H.G.M. Arets, T. Joosten, A. Siero, M. Brouha, J.Y. Mijnsbergen, J.C. de Jongste, and C.K. van der Ent
Measurements of interrupter resistance: reference values for children 3-13 yrs of age
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2002; 20(4): 907 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
S A McKenzie, E Chan, I Dundas, P D Bridge, C S Pao, M Mylonopoulou, and M J R Healy
Airway resistance measured by the interrupter technique: normative data for 2-10 year olds of three ethnicities
Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 2002; 87(3): 248 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. VILOZNI, M. BARKER, H. JELLOUSCHEK, G. HEIMANN, and H. BLAU
An Interactive Computer-Animated System (SpiroGame) Facilitates Spirometry in Preschool Children
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2001; 164(12): 2200 - 2205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S.A. McKenzie, M. Mylonopoulou, and P.D. Bridge
Bronchodilator responsiveness and atopy in 5-10-yr-old coughers
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2001; 18(6): 977 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
E Lombardi, P D Sly, G Concutelli, E Novembre, G Veneruso, G Frongia, R Bernardini, and A Vierucci
Reference values of interrupter respiratory resistance in healthy preschool white children
Thorax, September 1, 2001; 56(9): 691 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
R.J. Chavasse, Y. Bastian-Lee, and P. Seddon
Comparison of resistance measured by the interrupter technique and by passive mechanics in sedated infants
Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2001; 18(2): 330 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
F. Child, S. Clayton, S. Davies, A.A. Fryer, P.W. Jones, and W. Lenney
How should airways resistance be measured in young children: mask or mouthpiece?
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2001; 17(6): 1244 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. J. F. M. MERKUS, J. Y. MIJNSBERGEN, W. C. J. HOP, and J. C. de JONGSTE
Interrupter Resistance in Preschool Children . Measurement Characteristics and Reference Values
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2001; 163(6): 1350 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.