ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Ent, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bogaard, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Ent, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bogaard, J.
Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 1306-1313
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996


Original Articles

Improvement of tidal breathing pattern analysis in children with asthma by on-line automatic data processing

CK van der Ent, HJ Brackel, P Mulder, and JM Bogaard

The time taken to achieve peak tidal expiratory flow as a proportion of total expiratory time (t PTEF/t E) during tidal breathing (TB) is used as a parameter of airway obstruction in children with asthma. Curve selection bias is one of the most important limitations to the method. This study evaluates three curve selection methods, including a computer program, which on-line selects and analyses TB curves (Masterscreen Paediatric; Jaeger, Germany). TB analysis was performed in 26 children (aged 4-7 yrs) with asthma, before and after methacholine provocation and after subsequent bronchodilatation. Levels and stability of TB parameters derived from computer-selected, unselected and unbiased eye-selected curves were compared. t PTEF/t E ratios of the computer-selected curves agreed well with the unbiased eye-selected curves (limits of agreement -4.8 and +5.8%), but were significantly different from the ratios of unselected curves. Computer-derived t PTEF/t E ratios had the highest level of stability: the reliability coefficient of baseline measurements was 0.96 for computer selection, 0.84 for eye selection and 0.87 for no selection (reliability index = 1 at maximal stability). Tidal volume, respiratory rate, inspiratory and expiratory time were also assessed accurately by the computer program. The mean t PTEF/t E ratio (computer selection) dropped after methacholine provocation (from 30 +/- 9 to 22 +/- 9% at provocative dose at which forced expiratory volume in one second had dropped > or = 20% from baseline (FEV1-PD20 level), p < 0.001) and was restored after bronchodilation (30 +/- 6%; p < 0.001). We conclude that on-line computer analysis is preferable to no selection and to by-eye selection. The use of the program avoids curve selection bias and enhances the applicability of tidal breathing analysis as a measure of airflow obstruction in young children.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
N. Beydon, S. D. Davis, E. Lombardi, J. L. Allen, H. G. M. Arets, P. Aurora, H. Bisgaard, G. M. Davis, F. M. Ducharme, H. Eigen, et al.
An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Pulmonary Function Testing in Preschool Children
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2007; 175(12): 1304 - 1345.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.