ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorino, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lorino, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorino, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lorino, H
Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 1079-1086
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996


Original Articles

A new correction technique for measuring respiratory impedance through an endotracheal tube

AM Lorino, L Beydon, C Mariette, E Dahan, and H Lorino

Measurement of respiratory impedance (Zrs) in intubated patients requires corrections for flow-dependent resistance and air compression inside the endotracheal tube (ET). The purpose of this study was to test a new correction technique for these effects. We therefore studied 110 patients in two conditions: breathing normally (C1), or breathing through an ET placed at the mouth (C2). In C1, we measured pressure and flow signals at the mouth, and in C2, at the ET inlet, during application of a pseudorandom forced excitation (4-32 Hz). In C1, respiratory impedance was calculated directly as Z1. In C2, pressure data were first corrected for the flow-dependent resistance of the ET, and respiratory impedance was then corrected both for gas compression inside the set-up and ET inertance (impedance Z2). Strong linear relationships were found between the reference and corrected estimates of the resistance at 6 Hz, the frequency dependence of resistance and the resonant frequency. The mean normalized distance between Z1 and Z2 observed in the patients over the 4-32 Hz frequency range was about 14% for resistance and 12% for reactance (-9% and -4%, respectively, when considering the algebraic value of the distance). This slight underestimation of both components of impedance might be due to an overcorrection of pressure for the flow-dependent resistance of the ET. We conclude that, in intubated patients, newly tested corrections for the mechanical contribution of the endotracheal tube may yield a fair estimate of respiratory impedance when pressure is measured at the inlet of the endotracheal tube.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.