ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marchal, F
Right arrow Articles by Peslin, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marchal, F
Right arrow Articles by Peslin, R
Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 253-261
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996


Original Articles

Separation of airway and tissue properties by transfer respiratory impedance and thoracic gas volume in reversible airway obstruction

F Marchal, N Bouaziz, C Baeyert, C Gallina, C Duvivier, and R Peslin

The aim of this study was to establish the ability to estimate separate airway and tissue properties from transfer respiratory impedance (Zrs,tr) data in the presence of airway obstruction. Zrs,tr, thoracic gas volume (TGV) and airway resistance (Raw,pleth) were measured in the presence of obstruction and after use of a bronchodilator (BD) in 13 normal or asymptomatic asthmatic adults and 28 children with symptomatic asthma. An analytical approach was used to solve the equations of a simplified variant of DuBois' model, including airway resistance (Raw*) and inertance (Iaw), tissue compliance (Ct) and resistance (Rt) and pulmonary gas compliance (Cg). The equations of the model could not be reliably solved in four children before BD. Mean Raw,pleth was not different from mean Raw* in adults before (mean +/- SEM) (3.4 +/- 0.5 vs 3.1 +/- 0.3 hPa.s.L-1) or after BD (1.4 +/- 0.2 vs 1.8 +/- 0.2 hPa.s.L-1), or in children after BD (2.9 +/- 0.3 vs 3.2 +/- 0.2 hPa.s.L-1, respectively). In children before BD, Raw* was significantly underestimated compared with Raw,pleth (3.8 +/- 0.4 vs 5.4 +/- 0.6 hPa.s.L-1). Overall, a significant positive correlation was found between the difference [Raw,pleth - Raw*] and Raw,pleth (r = 0.82). In adults, BD induced a decrease in Raw* and Rt, an increase in Ct, and no change in Iaw. In children after BD, there was no significant change in Raw* or Ct, whilst Rt decreased and Iaw increased. Taking Raw,pleth as the gold standard, it is concluded that coherent estimation of parameters of DuBois' model may be obtained from combined Zrs,tr and TGV measurements in normal subjects and moderately obstructed adults, but not in children with significant airway obstruction. This seems to be due to the systematic under-estimation of Raw*.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
N. Beydon, S. D. Davis, E. Lombardi, J. L. Allen, H. G. M. Arets, P. Aurora, H. Bisgaard, G. M. Davis, F. M. Ducharme, H. Eigen, et al.
An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Pulmonary Function Testing in Preschool Children
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2007; 175(12): 1304 - 1345.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
K. R. LUTCHEN, A. SULLIVAN, F. T. ARBOGAST, B. R. CELLI, and A. C. JACKSON
Use of Transfer Impedance Measurements for Clinical Assessment of Lung Mechanics
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 1997; 157(2): 435 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.