ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tonnesen, P
Right arrow Articles by Evald, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tonnesen, P
Right arrow Articles by Evald, T
Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 2351-2355
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996


Clinical Trial

Nurse-conducted smoking cessation with minimal intervention in a lung clinic: a randomized controlled study

P Tonnesen, K Mikkelsen, C Markholst, A Ibsen, M Bendixen, L Pedersen, R Fuursted, LH Hansen, H Stensgaard, R Schiotz, T Petersen, L Breman, P Clementsen, and T Evald

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a motivational, minimal intervention approach to smoking cessation in an open, randomized design conducted by nurses as routine work in a lung clinic. Subjects who smoked less than 10 cigarettes x day(-1), and subjects who smoked > or = 10 cigarettes x day(-1) and who had refused to participate in a smoking cessation trial with nicotine replacement therapy, were randomly allocated to a motivational approach to smoking cessation or to a control group. The motivational approach consisted of a nurse-conducted 5 min consultation concerning reasons to quit smoking, brochures about smoking cessation and advice about how to quit. After 4-6 weeks, subjects in the motivational group received a letter encouraging them to quit smoking. After 1 year, all subjects were contacted by phone and smoking status reported. Subjects claiming to be abstinent attended the clinic for carbon monoxide verification. A total of 507 subjects were enrolled, 254 in the motivational group and 253 in the control group. The mean age of the motivational group was 51 yrs, 50% were males and they smoked a mean of 13 cigarettes x day(-1). The mean age of the control group was 53 yrs, 61% were males and they smoked a mean of 12 cigarettes x day(-1). At the 1 year follow-up, the success rate for point prevalence (no smoking at 1 year and during the preceding month) was 8, 7% in the motivational group versus 3.6% in the control group (p=0.025). The 12 months sustained success rate (no smoking at all during the year) was 3.1 versus 1.2% (p=0.22). The point prevalence for light smokers (<10 cigarettes x day(-1)) was 13.9% in the motivational group versus 6.3% in control group (p=0.12), and for heavy smokers (10 or more cigarettes x day(-1)) 5.2% versus 1.9% (p=0.20). In conclusion, the effect of this nurse-conducted, minimal intervention, motivational approach seems promising as the quit rate at 1 year follow-up had doubled.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P. Tonnesen, L. Carrozzi, K. O. Fagerstrom, C. Gratziou, C. Jimenez-Ruiz, S. Nardini, G. Viegi, C. Lazzaro, I. A. Campell, E. Dagli, et al.
Smoking cessation in patients with respiratory diseases: a high priority, integral component of therapy
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2007; 29(2): 390 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. Tonnesen, K. Mikkelsen, and L. Bremann
Nurse-Conducted Smoking Cessation in Patients With COPD Using Nicotine Sublingual Tablets and Behavioral Support.
Chest, August 1, 2006; 130(2): 334 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
P. Tonnesen
Essential communication skills in individual smoking cessation
Chronic Respiratory Disease, October 1, 2004; 1(4): 221 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.