Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 2351-2355
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996
Nurse-conducted smoking cessation with minimal intervention in a lung clinic: a randomized controlled study
P Tonnesen,
K Mikkelsen,
C Markholst,
A Ibsen,
M Bendixen,
L Pedersen,
R Fuursted,
LH Hansen,
H Stensgaard,
R Schiotz,
T Petersen,
L Breman,
P Clementsen,
and
T Evald
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a motivational, minimal intervention approach to smoking cessation in an open, randomized design conducted by nurses as routine work in a lung clinic. Subjects who smoked less than 10 cigarettes x day(-1), and subjects who smoked > or = 10 cigarettes x day(-1) and who had refused to participate in a smoking cessation trial with nicotine replacement therapy, were randomly allocated to a motivational approach to smoking cessation or to a control group. The motivational approach consisted of a nurse-conducted 5 min consultation concerning reasons to quit smoking, brochures about smoking cessation and advice about how to quit. After 4-6 weeks, subjects in the motivational group received a letter encouraging them to quit smoking. After 1 year, all subjects were contacted by phone and smoking status reported. Subjects claiming to be abstinent attended the clinic for carbon monoxide verification. A total of 507 subjects were enrolled, 254 in the motivational group and 253 in the control group. The mean age of the motivational group was 51 yrs, 50% were males and they smoked a mean of 13 cigarettes x day(-1). The mean age of the control group was 53 yrs, 61% were males and they smoked a mean of 12 cigarettes x day(-1). At the 1 year follow-up, the success rate for point prevalence (no smoking at 1 year and during the preceding month) was 8, 7% in the motivational group versus 3.6% in the control group (p=0.025). The 12 months sustained success rate (no smoking at all during the year) was 3.1 versus 1.2% (p=0.22). The point prevalence for light smokers (<10 cigarettes x day(-1)) was 13.9% in the motivational group versus 6.3% in control group (p=0.12), and for heavy smokers (10 or more cigarettes x day(-1)) 5.2% versus 1.9% (p=0.20). In conclusion, the effect of this nurse-conducted, minimal intervention, motivational approach seems promising as the quit rate at 1 year follow-up had doubled.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H Ashraf, P Tonnesen, J Holst Pedersen, A Dirksen, H Thorsen, and M Dossing
Effect of CT screening on smoking habits at 1-year follow-up in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLCST)
Thorax,
May 1, 2009;
64(5):
388 - 392.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Mottillo, K. B. Filion, P. Belisle, L. Joseph, A. Gervais, J. O'Loughlin, G. Paradis, R. Pihl, L. Pilote, S. Rinfret, et al.
Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Eur. Heart J.,
March 2, 2009;
30(6):
718 - 730.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Tonnesen, L. Carrozzi, K. O. Fagerstrom, C. Gratziou, C. Jimenez-Ruiz, S. Nardini, G. Viegi, C. Lazzaro, I. A. Campell, E. Dagli, et al.
Smoking cessation in patients with respiratory diseases: a high priority, integral component of therapy
Eur. Respir. J.,
February 1, 2007;
29(2):
390 - 417.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Tonnesen, K. Mikkelsen, and L. Bremann
Nurse-Conducted Smoking Cessation in Patients With COPD Using Nicotine Sublingual Tablets and Behavioral Support.
Chest,
August 1, 2006;
130(2):
334 - 342.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Tonnesen
Essential communication skills in individual smoking cessation
Chronic Respiratory Disease,
October 1, 2004;
1(4):
221 - 227.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.
|