ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castiglioni, P
Right arrow Articles by Morpurgo, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castiglioni, P
Right arrow Articles by Morpurgo, M
Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 2328-2334
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996


Original Articles

Does spontaneous respiration alter pulmonary artery input impedance?

P Castiglioni, M Di Rienzo, M Grossoni, R Tommasini, and M Morpurgo

The aim of this study was to determine whether spontaneous respiration influences pulmonary artery input impedance, a question that has received little attention in the literature. Impedance values were assessed during three different phases of the respiratory cycle, namely inspiration, expiration and postexpiration (i.e. the null respiratory flow period between expiration and the next inspiration) in five anaesthetized spontaneously breathing dogs. Firstly, impedance values during postexpiration were taken as the reference baseline, and compared with values obtained during inspiration and expiration. Then, differences between values in inspiration and in expiration were tested, taking impedance during inspiration as the baseline. Differences with respect to postexpiration were found for three parameters of input impedance: input resistance, characteristic impedance, and the frequency at the first zero-crossing of the impedance phase from negative to positive values (f(cross)). Input resistance was significantly lower in inspiration (85% of the baseline), characteristic impedance was significantly greater in inspiration and in expiration (112 and 119% respectively), and f(cross) was significantly lower in expiration (89%). By contrast, only input resistance differed significantly when inspiration was compared to expiration. Therefore, spontaneous respiration was shown to influence input impedance significantly. The observed changes in characteristic impedance and f(cross) might be explained by a stiffening of the pulmonary artery wall, due to neural and/or mechanical factors, during inspiration and expiration.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. Castiglioni, R. Tommasini, M. Morpurgo, and M. Di Rienzo
Modulation of pulmonary arterial input impedance during transition from inspiration to expiration
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1997; 83(6): 2123 - 2130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.