ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Overbeek, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bogaard, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Overbeek, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bogaard, J.
Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 2256-2262
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996


Clinical Trial

Effects of fluticasone propionate on methacholine dose-response curves in nonsmoking atopic asthmatics

SE Overbeek, PR Rijnbeek, C Vons, PG Mulder, HC Hoogsteden, and JM Bogaard

Methacholine is frequently used to determine bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and to generate dose-response curves. These curves are characterized by a threshold (provocative concentration of methacholine producing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20) = sensitivity), slope (reactivity) and maximal response (plateau). We investigated the efficacy of 12 weeks of treatment with 1,000 microg fluticasone propionate in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 33 atopic asthmatics. The outcome measures used were the influence on BHR and the different indices of the methacholine dose-response (MDR) curve. After 2 weeks run-in, baseline lung function data were obtained and a MDR curve was measured with doubling concentrations of the methacholine from 0.03 to 256 mg x mL(-1). MDR curves were repeated after 6 and 12 weeks. A recently developed, sigmoid cumulative Gaussian distribution function was fitted to the data. Although sensitivity was obtained by linear interpolation of two successive log2 concentrations, reactivity, plateau and the effective concentration at 50% of the plateau value (EC50) were obtained as best fit parameters. In the fluticasone group, significant changes occurred after 6 weeks with respect to means of PC20 (an increase of 3.4 doubling doses), plateau value fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (from 58% at randomization to 41% at 6 weeks) and baseline FEV1 (from 3.46 to 3.75 L) in contrast to the placebo group. Stabilization occurred after 12 weeks. Changes for reactivity were less marked, whereas changes in log, EC50 were not significantly different between the groups. We conclude that fluticasone is very effective in decreasing the maximal airway narrowing response and in increasing PC20. However, it is likely that part of this increase is related to the decrease of the plateau of maximal response.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
G T Verhoeven, J P J J Hegmans, P G H Mulder, J M Bogaard, H C Hoogsteden, and J-B Prins
Effects of fluticasone propionate in COPD patients with bronchial hyperresponsiveness
Thorax, August 1, 2002; 57(8): 694 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
J C Kips and R A Pauwels
Low dose inhaled corticosteroids and the prevention of death from asthma
Thorax, September 1, 2001; 56(90002): ii74 - 78.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
H. Milgrom, W. Berger, A. Nayak, N. Gupta, S. Pollard, M. McAlary, A. F. Taylor, and P. Rohane
Treatment of Childhood Asthma With Anti-Immunoglobulin E Antibody (Omalizumab)
Pediatrics, August 1, 2001; 108 (2): e36 - e36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
L. P. NIELSEN and R. DAHL
Therapeutic Ratio of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Adult Asthma . A Dose-Range Comparison between Fluticasone Propionate and Budesonide, Measuring Their Effect on Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness and Adrenal Cortex Function
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2000; 162(6): 2053 - 2057.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.