ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gautier, V
Right arrow Articles by Godard, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gautier, V
Right arrow Articles by Godard, P
Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 58-64
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996


Original Articles

Comparison of an expert system with other clinical scores for the evaluation of severity of asthma

V Gautier, H Redier, JL Pujol, J Bousquet, H Proudhon, C Michel, JP Daures, FB Michel, and P Godard

"Asthmaexpert" was produced at the special request of several clinicians in order to obtain a better understanding of the medical decisions taken by clinical experts in the management of asthmatic patients. In order to assess the severity of asthma, a new score called Artificial Intelligence score (AI score), produced by Asthmaexpert, was compared with three other scores (Aas, Hargreave and Brooks). One hundred patients were enrolled prospectively in the study during their first consultation in the out-patient clinic. Distribution of severity level according to the different scores was studied, and the reliability between AI and other scores was evaluated by Kappa and MacNemar tests. Correlations with functional parameters were performed. The AI score assessed higher levels of severity than the other scores (Kappa = 18, 28 and 10% for Aas, Hargreave and Brooks, respectively) with significant MacNemar test in all cases. There was a significant correlation between AI score and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (r = 0.73). These data indicate that the AI score is a severity score which defines higher levels of severity than the chosen scores. Correlations for functional parameters are good. This score appears easy to use for the first consultation of an asthmatic patient.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
G. L. COLICE, J. V. BURGT, J. SONG, P. STAMPONE, and P. J. THOMPSON
Categorizing Asthma Severity
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 1999; 160(6): 1962 - 1967.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
A J WOOLCOCK, D DUSSER, and I FAJAC
Severity of chronic asthma
Thorax, June 1, 1998; 53(6): 442 - 444.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.