ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez de Castro, F
Right arrow Articles by Bolanos Guerra, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez de Castro, F
Right arrow Articles by Bolanos Guerra, J
Eur Respir J 1996; 9: 37-41
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1996


Original Articles

Do quantitative cultures of protected brush specimens modify the initial empirical therapy in ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia?

F Rodriguez de Castro, J Sole-Violan, A Aranda Leon, J Blanco Lopez, G Julia-Serda, P Cabrera Navarro, and J Bolanos Guerra

The real contribution of the protected specimen brush (PSB) to guide the choice of antimicrobial therapy in ventilated patients with severe pneumonia is not well established. This study aimed to assess how data obtained by PSB changed the initial empirical therapy. One hundred and ten ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia were entered into a prospective study. All patients underwent fibreoptic bronchoscopy within the first 24 h after clinical suspicion of pneumonia. Specimens were obtained by PSB and were processed for quantitative cultures using standard methods. When patients were started on empirical antibiotics, a standard therapeutic regimen was followed. The decision to introduce, withdraw, maintain, or modify antibiotic therapy, according to the PSB culture results, was left to the attending physician. Pneumonia was the final diagnosis in 45 (41%) of the 110 patients. Pneumonia was excluded in 47 (43%) patients and in the remaining 18 (16%) the diagnosis was uncertain. The initial therapeutic plans were considered to be adequate in 40 patients (36%) and inadequate in 37 cases (34%). In 17 patients (15%), therapeutic changes were made based on the results of PSB cultures. In one case appropriate antibiotics were introduced; in nine cases the therapeutic regimen was reduced to select a narrower and rational therapy; and in seven patients therapy was changed because the prescribed antimicrobial agents were ineffective against the organisms recovered. This study shows that therapeutic changes were made based on the results of PSB cultures in 38% of the patients with pneumonia. In contrast, the PSB technique has no impact on antimicrobial therapy of patients without pneumonia.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Rello, J. A. Paiva, J. Baraibar, F. Barcenilla, M. Bodi, D. Castander, H. Correa, E. Diaz, J. Garnacho, M. Llorio, et al.
International Conference for the Development of Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Chest, September 1, 2001; 120(3): 955 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. RELLO, M. GALLEGO, D. MARISCAL, R. SOORA, and J. VALLES
The Value of Routine Microbial Investigation in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 1997; 156(1): 196 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the European Respiratory Society.