ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, P.
Eur Respir J 1995; 8: 1130-1135
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1995


Original Articles

Ventilatory muscle strength and endurance in myasthenia gravis

SP Keenan, D Alexander, JD Road, CF Ryan, J Oger, and PG Wilcox

Patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) often have associated ventilatory muscle involvement. It is not known whether patients with isolated ocular muscle involvement have identifiable involvement of their ventilatory muscles. Most studies have assessed muscle involvement by measuring muscle strength; however, we hypothesized that measures of ventilatory muscle endurance may be more sensitive tests of ventilatory muscle involvement in myasthenia gravis. We studied 17 patients with myasthenia gravis (four with ocular involvement alone and 13 with varying degrees of generalized myasthenia gravis). Spirometry, ventilatory muscle strength (maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP)) and endurance (2 min incremental threshold loading test) were measured before and 20 min after i.m. neostigmine. We compared the results with those of 10 normal controls. We found no difference between patients with isolated ocular involvement and controls. Ocular myasthenia gravis patients did not improve after neostigmine. The patients with generalized myasthenia gravis had reduced baseline ventilatory muscle strength (MIP 67 cmH2O (70% of predicted), MEP 86 cmH2O (50% of pred) and endurance (mean maximal load achieved = 246 g, mean pressure at highest load (P) = 19.4 cmH2O) compared with controls. After neostigmine, there was a significant increase in MIP in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis and a trend towards an increased MEP. As a group, the patients with generalized myasthenia gravis did not demonstrate a change in their ventilatory muscle endurance after neostigmine; however, there was considerable interpatient variability in response. We conclude that patients with isolated ocular MG have normal ventilatory muscle strength when tested conventionally.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
E. van Lunteren, M. Moyer, and H. J. Kaminski
Adverse effects of myasthenia gravis on rat phrenic diaphragm contractile performance
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2004; 97(3): 895 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
F. Laghi and M. J. Tobin
Disorders of the Respiratory Muscles
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2003; 168(1): 10 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. R. EASTWOOD, D. R. HILLMAN, A. R. MORTON, and K. E. FINUCANE
The Effects of Learning on the Ventilatory Responses to Inspiratory Threshold Loading
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 1998; 158(4): 1190 - 1196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the European Respiratory Society.