ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Quanjer, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Quanjer, P.
Eur Respir J 1995; 8: 849-855
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1995


Original Articles

Frequency response of variable orifice type peak flow meters: requirements and testing

OF Pedersen, TR Rasmussen, SK Kjaergaard, MR Miller, and PH Quanjer

Little is known about the response of variable orifice peak flow meters to high frequency flow input. The purpose of this study was to define and test dynamic requirements for such peak flow meters. In a population sample we measured peak expiratory flow (PEF), rise time (tr), from 10-90% PEF and the duration of the flow in excess of 97.5, 95 and 90% of PEF, by use of a carefully calibrated Fleisch pneumotachograph with known and adequate frequency response. Three peak flow meters (Mini Wright, Vitalograph and Ferraris) were tested with an explosive decompression calibrator adjusted to values for PEF and tr as close as possible to the 95th and 5th percentile values, respectively, both for males and females, and with peak durations between 5 and more than 100 ms. The 95th percentile values of PEF were 597 L.min-1 for females and 894 L.min-1 for males. The 5th percentile values of tr were, respectively 55 and 45 ms. The duration of flow in excess of 95% PEF was longer than 10 ms in 99% of the subjects. For all meters, the deviation of PEF corrected for alinearity were less than 5% at a peak duration of 10 ms. We conclude that PEF, rise time, and peak duration can be used for description of dynamic properties of variable orifice meters, and that the tested meters had a satisfactory frequency response for recording PEF in mostly normal subjects.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
M R Miller, P R Atkins, and O F Pedersen
Inadequate peak expiratory flow meter characteristics detected by a computerised explosive decompression device
Thorax, May 1, 2003; 58(5): 411 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. R. Miller and O. F. Pedersen
Peak flowmeter resistance decreases peak expiratory flow in subjects with COPD
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2000; 89(1): 283 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. R. MILLER, B. JONES, Y. XU, O. F. PEDERSEN, and P. H. QUANJER
Peak Expiratory Flow Profiles Delivered by Pump Systems . Limitations due to Wave Action
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2000; 161(6): 1887 - 1896.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. R. MILLER, O. F. PEDERSEN, and P. H. QUANJER
The Rise and Dwell Time for Peak Expiratory Flow in Patients with and without Airflow Limitation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 1998; 158(1): 23 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
O. F. Pedersen, T. F. Pedersen, and M. R. Miller
Gas compression in lungs decreases peak expiratory flow depending on resistance of peak flowmeter
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 1997; 83(5): 1517 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the European Respiratory Society.