ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, H
Right arrow Articles by Heyder, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, H
Right arrow Articles by Heyder, J
Eur Respir J 1995; 8: 566-573
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1995


Original Articles

Aerosol bolus dispersion and effective airway diameters in mildly asthmatic children

H Schulz, A Schulz, P Brand, T Tuch, E von Mutius, R Erdl, D Reinhardt, and J Heyder

The contribution of aerosol techniques, the estimation of aerosol bolus dispersion and effective airway dimensions, to the clinical diagnosis of paediatric asthma was studied. In 47 children, aged 11 +/- 2 yrs, with mild asthma (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 83 +/- 9% of forced vital capacity (FVC)) effective airway diameters were derived from the recovery of inhaled 1 micron sebacate droplets. Intrapulmonary dispersion of inhaled boluses of 0.4 micron droplets was studied, by characterizing the concentration distributions of droplets in the exhaled air by their standard deviation and skewness. Effective airway diameters increased in asthmatic subjects with increasing body size, and did not differ from those obtained in 16 healthy children of similar age and height. Standard deviation and skewness of particle boluses exhaled from shallow lung depths were higher in the asthmatic children than the healthy children (e.g. standard deviation 91 +/- 17 ml vs 79 +/- 15 ml, skewness 0.38 +/- 0.16 vs 0.23 +/- 0.16, respectively, for boluses in 140 ml lung depth). The sensitivity and specificity of bolus dispersion to detect alterations in lung function was comparable to that of FEV1/FVC, the most sensitive conventional lung function parameter in the present study. There was no correlation between body height or lung function and bolus parameters. We conclude that aerosol measurements do not provide an obvious benefit for the clinical diagnosis of mild paediatric asthma, but bolus dispersion supplies additional information on alterations in convective gas transport in the diseased lung.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S. B. Shaker, N. Maltbaek, P. Brand, S. Haeussermann, and A. Dirksen
Quantitative computed tomography and aerosol morphometry in COPD and {alpha}1-antitrypsin deficiency
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 23 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. Verbanck, D. Schuermans, M. Paiva, and W. Vincken
Saline aerosol bolus dispersion. II. The effect of conductive airway alteration
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2001; 90(5): 1763 - 1769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. S. Brown, T. R. Gerrity, and W. D. Bennett
Effect of ventilation distribution on aerosol bolus dispersion and recovery
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1998; 85(6): 2112 - 2117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the European Respiratory Society.