ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heaney, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ennis, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heaney, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ennis, M
Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 1527-1531
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1994


Original Articles

Electronic cell counting to measure total cell numbers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

LG Heaney, J McKirgan, CF Stanford, and M Ennis

Cell counting of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid is performed manually in routine practice. This has both methodological and inherent errors; however, the accuracy and suitability of automated counting devices have been questioned. In this study, a Coulter Counter D Industrial model was calibrated and then used to measure the total cell count in unprocessed bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and compared to a standard manual method. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed on 34 patients undergoing routine bronchoscopy. An aliquot of unprocessed bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was taken for all counting procedures. Manual counts were performed blind by two experienced independent observers using improved Neubauer chambers. Electronic counting measured 1 ml aliquots suspended in 10 and 20 ml Isoton counting 0.5 and 1 ml duplicates. The correlation coefficients between electronic and manual counts were good. The coefficients of repeatability of electronic counts, for repeat counts, both on the same dilution (Intra-Coulter: 0.1 x 10(5) cells.ml-1) and different dilutions (Interdilution-Coulter: 0.48 x 10(5) cells.ml-1), were superior compared to those for repeat manual counts by the same observer (1.03 x 10(5) cells.ml-1), and counts between observers (1.82 x 10(5) cells.ml-1). This method offers a quick, precise and simple method for counting cells in unprocessed bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, which is both less labour intensive and subjective than manual counting.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
Y. C. G. Lee, K. B. Lane, and R. W. Light
Coulter Counter Registers Talc Particles as Leukocytes
Chest, February 1, 2001; 119(2): 669 - 670.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the European Respiratory Society.