ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Angus, R.
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Angus, R.
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, N.
Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 1084-1089
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1994


Clinical Trial

No effect of the oral neutral endopeptidase inhibitor candoxatril, on bronchomotor tone and histamine reactivity in asthma

RM Angus, MJ McCallum, JE Nally, and NC Thomson

Neutral endopeptidase (NEP) is found in many tissues in man, including the lung. Metabolism by NEP is one of the main mechanisms for the clearance of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), a hormone that causes bronchodilation and reduces nonspecific bronchial reactivity in man. Candoxatril, an oral NEP inhibitor has been shown to elevate circulating ANP levels. We have sought to determine whether the administration of candoxatril will alter bronchomotor tone (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)) and histamine reactivity. Ten male asthmatic patients with stable asthma were enrolled (mean (SD) age 32 (10) yrs; FEV1 92 (11)% predicted) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. On each study day, after baseline spirometry, patients received 200 mg of candoxatril or placebo. Spirometry was repeated at half hourly intervals. After 2 h a histamine inhalation test was performed. There was no significant difference in FEV1 values at baseline or at 2 h post-dosing between active and placebo study days, with mean (SEM) FEV1 at baseline and 2 h of 3.71 (0.29) l and 3.85 (0.29) l on the placebo day, and 3.89 (0.27) l and 4.05 (0.82) l on the active day, respectively. The geometric mean (range) provocative concentration of histamine producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) on the placebo day and active day did not differ significantly, being 1.17 (0.25-25.8) and 0.93 (0.13-32) mg.ml-1, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the European Respiratory Society.