ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bohadana, A.
Right arrow Articles by Toamain, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bohadana, A.
Right arrow Articles by Toamain, J.
Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 1070-1076
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1994


Original Articles

Respiratory symptoms and airway responsiveness in apparently healthy workers exposed to flour dust

AB Bohadana, N Massin, P Wild, MN Kolopp, and JP Toamain

Our aim was to measure the levels of exposure to wheat flour dust in a modern industrial bakery, and to assess the relationship between respiratory symptoms, sensitization to wheat flour antigens and airway responsiveness in the workforce. Forty four flour-exposed male workers and 164 unexposed controls were examined. Inspirable dust concentrations were measured using personal samplers. Respiratory symptoms were assessed by questionnaire, sensitization to wheat flour antigens by skin-prick tests, and methacholine airway challenge (MAC) test using an abbreviated method. Subjects were labelled MAC+ if forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) fell by 20% or more. The linear dose-response slope (DRS) was calculated as the percentage fall in FEV1 at last dose divided by the total dose administered. Inspirable dust concentrations were within acceptable limits in all working areas but one. The proportion of subjects with one or more symptoms and with airway hyperresponsiveness was significantly greater among flour-exposed workers than among controls. Using logistic or linear regression analysis, airway responsiveness was found to be strongly related to working at the bakery and to the baseline level of lung function. A positive skin-prick test was found in only 11% of flour-exposed workers and 6% of controls. In conclusion, our data show that despite exposure to relatively low concentration levels of inspirable flour dust, subjects working in the baking industry are at risk of developing both respiratory symptoms and airway hyperresponsiveness.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
R. Baatjies, A. L. Lopata, I. Sander, M. Raulf-Heimsoth, E. D. Bateman, T. Meijster, D. Heederik, T. G. Robins, and M. F. Jeebhay
Determinants of asthma phenotypes in supermarket bakery workers
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2009; 34(4): 825 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
N Massin, G Hecht, D Ambroise, M Hery, J P Toamain, G Hubert, M Dorotte, and B Bianchi
Respiratory symptoms and bronchial responsiveness among cleaning and disinfecting workers in the food industry
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2007; 64(2): 75 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J. Brisman, B. Jarvholm, and L. Lillienberg
Exposure-response relations for self reported asthma and rhinitis in bakers
Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2000; 57(5): 335 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the European Respiratory Society.