ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakadate, T
Right arrow Articles by Kagawa, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakadate, T
Right arrow Articles by Kagawa, J
Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 1062-1069
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1994


Original Articles

Longitudinal changes in time domain spirogram indices and their variability

T Nakadate, T Sato, and J Kagawa

The purpose of this study was to describe longitudinal changes in time domain spirogram indices and their variability. We therefore measured forced expiratory spirograms of 326 middle-aged male employees in two asbestos-using factories four times over 5 yrs. From the original sample of 326, 225 healthy subjects, who provided reliable results for three or more surveys, were selected for analysis. The mean and standard deviation of transit time and their log-transformed values (MTT, STT, ln(MTT), and ln(STT), respectively), as well as two indices of the estimated time constant distribution (Mu and Sigma, respectively) were analysed using a longitudinal model. The longitudinally estimated annual increase of MTT, STT, ln(MTT), and ln(STT) was about three times larger than the cross-sectional estimate, whilst they were comparable in Mu and Sigma. A highly significant contribution of between-subject variability was found in all indices. This was particularly remarkable in the mean components. The between-subject variability was about eight times larger than the error variance in Mu, and three times in MTT and ln(MTT). We conclude that the longitudinal data of transit time indices should not be compared with cross-sectional reference values, and that the magnitude of error variance of these indices in longitudinal repeated measurements will be rather less than the cross-sectional counterpart reported previously.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the European Respiratory Society.