ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Harding, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Harding, R.
Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 991-997
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1994

Original Articles

Portable peak flow meters: physical characteristics, influence of temperature, altitude, and humidity

OF Pedersen, MR Miller, T Sigsgaard, M Tidley, and RM Harding

Little is known about the linearity of portable peak flow meters, or about physical gas factors affecting peak expiratory flow (PEF) readings. We therefore tested five portable peak flow meters of three types in an altitude chamber (sea level to 5,500 m) and in a climate chamber at sea level (7-37 degrees C) to determine the influence of the physical conditions of the gas on the reading of the meters. The nonlinear response of the variable orifice meters was confirmed and, when this was corrected for, the readings of these meters were found to be significantly reduced by higher altitude and lower temperature. The readings from a turbine type of peak flow meter were not affected by altitude but were reduced at low temperature. A mathematical model for the variable orifice meters could correct for both their nonlinear behaviour and the effect of gas density (altitude, temperature and humidity). The model showed that correction is not necessary for the differences in gas conditions between calibration and taking of measurements under normal laboratory conditions. All the meters tested had impedances higher than recommended (0.05 kPa.l-1.s) and this may influence PEF at high flows. The mean uncorrected PEF of six healthy subjects when measured with a Mini Wright peak flow meter at sea level and at 3,000 m fell by 5%, but the mean corrected PEF increased by 12%. This increase in PEF was about 60% of that predicted for fully density-dependent flow and agreed with the findings of other similar studies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
A. M. Luks and E. R. Swenson
Travel to high altitude with pre-existing lung disease
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2007; 29(4): 770 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ThoraxHome page
M R Miller, P R Atkins, and O F Pedersen
Inadequate peak expiratory flow meter characteristics detected by a computerised explosive decompression device
Thorax, May 1, 2003; 58(5): 411 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ThoraxHome page
C M Wilson, S E Bakewell, M R Miller, N D Hart, R C N McMorrow, P W Barry, D J Collier, S J Watt, and A J Pollard
Increased resting bronchial tone in normal subjects acclimatised to altitude
Thorax, May 1, 2002; 57(5): 400 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
P.W. Barry, N.P. Mason, and J-P. Richalet
Nasal peak inspiratory flow at altitude
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2002; 19(1): 16 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. G. IRVIN, R. J. MARTIN, V. M. CHINCHILLI, S. J. KUNSELMAN, and R. M. CHERNIACK
Quality Control of Peak Flow Meters for Multicenter Clinical Trials
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 1997; 156(2): 396 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the European Respiratory Society.