ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hendrick, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hendrick, D.
Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 961-968
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1994

Original Articles

Management of occupational asthma

DJ Hendrick

The importance of occupational asthma and its management is usefully set in perspective by considering recent trends of increasing asthma incidence, morbidity and mortality in the population at large. The contribution to incidence made by asthma of occupational origin is of the order 20-100 cases per million workers per year; the individual worker's lifetime risk approaching 5% in some industrial environments. Management of the affected industry inevitably follows different pathways from that of the affected individual, though both need to start from a definitive diagnosis. For the affected industry, managers must identify the causative agent and assess the extent of the problem. Affected workers can then be removed from hazardous settings, and meaningful strategies of prevention can be introduced. The most promising preventive measures involve improvements in industrial hygiene or the substitution of alternative agents in the manufacturing process. The role of worker selection (i.e. the exclusion of applicant workers who may be unduly susceptible because they smoke, or have existing airway hyperresponsiveness or atopy) is small and controversial. More valuable is a strict surveillance programme of workers perceived to be at risk, so that emerging disease is recognized promptly, before it poses any major threat of permanent ill-health. Management choices beyond conventional medication and the avoidance of irritant environmental triggers are greatly limited for the affected individual worker. A change of job environment with complete cessation of exposure to the relevant asthma-inducing agent is to be favoured and offers the best chance of full recovery, but may not be practical if the worker is to avoid permanent unemployment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
K. Radon, S. Huemmer, H. Dressel, D. Windstetter, G. Weinmayr, S. Weiland, E. Riu, C. Vogelberg, W. Leupold, E. von Mutius, et al.
Do respiratory symptoms predict job choices in teenagers?
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 774 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
A. Marabini, A. Siracusa, R. Stopponi, C. Tacconi, and G. Abbritti
Outcome of Occupational Asthma in Patients With Continuous Exposure: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study During Pharmacologic Treatment
Chest, December 1, 2003; 124(6): 2372 - 2376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
L. C. Grammer, K. E. Harris, and P. R. Yarnold
Effect of Respiratory Protective Devices on Development of Antibody and Occupational Asthma to an Acid Anhydride*
Chest, April 1, 2002; 121(4): 1317 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the European Respiratory Society.