ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soyseth, V
Right arrow Articles by Boe, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soyseth, V
Right arrow Articles by Boe, J
Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 888-894
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1994


Original Articles

Bronchial responsiveness and decline in FEV1 in aluminium potroom workers

V Soyseth, J Kongerud, H Kjuus, and J Boe

We have investigated the relationship between annual decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (delta FEV1) and bronchial responsiveness (BR) in aluminium potroom workers. BR was measured in a cross-sectional study of 337 aluminium potroom workers half-way through a 6 yr follow-up study of lung function. A skin-prick test (SPT) was also performed. During follow-up the mean number of measurements of lung function (FEV1) in each subject was 6.8. Mean delta FEV1 was 21.3 ml.yr-1 (within subject SD = 30.5 ml.yr-1). Mean delta FEV1 was 57.0, 44.5 and 16.6 ml.yr-1 in subjects who had provocative concentration producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) < or = 8.0, 8.1-32.0 and > 32.0 mg.ml-1, respectively. After adjustment for gender, atopy, smoking habit, FEV1, age and familial asthma the association between BR and delta FEV1 was weakened, and was not statistically significant. A significantly accelerated decline in FEV1 with age was found. The difference in delta FEV1 between smokers and nonsmokers was 39.3 ml.yr-1, and between subjects who had a positive skin-prick test compared to subjects with a negative skin-prick test 39.6 ml.yr-1. In subjects reporting work-related asthmatic symptoms the decline in FEV1 was 43.2 ml.yr-1 greater than in asymptomatic subjects. In asymptomatic subjects, positive skin-prick test was also associated with increased delta FEV1. These data indicate that a single measurement of BR is not a predictor of delta FEV1 in aluminium potroom workers. Smoking, work-related asthmatic symptoms, and positive reaction to skin-prick test in asymptomatic workers were risk factors of increased delta FEV1.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Cui, N. de Klerk, M. Abramson, A. Del Monaco, G. Benke, M. Dennekamp, A. W. Musk, and M. Sim
Fractional Polynomials and Model Selection in Generalized Estimating Equations Analysis, With an Application to a Longitudinal Epidemiologic Study in Australia
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2009; 169(1): 113 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
S. C McKarns, C. J Smith, M. J Morton, V. M Payne, D L. Davis, L. W Stringer, and D. J Doolittle
Correlation of hematologic markers of inflammation and lung function: a comparison of asymptomatic smokers and nonsmokers
Human and Experimental Toxicology, June 1, 1996; 15(6): 523 - 532.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the European Respiratory Society.