ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Venables, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Venables, K.
Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 768-778
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1994


Original Articles

Prevention of occupational asthma

KM Venables

This paper focuses on the prevention of asthma caused by exposure to sensitizing agents in the workplace. Control of exposure (primary prevention) is the most direct method of reducing the number of incident cases. Screening programmes are also necessary as a "safety net", and have value as secondary prevention, because early detection may improve long-term prognosis. It is recommended that regulatory or advisory bodies with responsibility for occupational asthma publish a guidance document on occupational asthma explaining their current concepts. Surveillance activities provide information on how common asthma is relative to other occupational lung diseases, and on the relative frequency of occurrence of asthma caused by different agents. Publication of a list of sensitizing agents would aid those with responsibility for control of exposure in the workplace. Epidemiological research on exposure-response relations is is necessary as a background to prevention. This paper recommends such studies. Immunotoxicological research also has a role in testing hypotheses that cannot be tested in human subjects. Some standardization of screening programmes in industry is desirable. A short symptoms questionnaire is economical and acceptable to workers, but there are other approaches. Finally, evaluative research on prevention measures gives information on their effectiveness and efficiency.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
E Meijer, D E Grobbee, and D Heederik
A strategy for health surveillance in laboratory animal workers exposed to high molecular weight allergens
Occup. Environ. Med., October 1, 2004; 61(10): 831 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
American Thoracic Society Statement: Occupational Contribution to the Burden of Airway Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2003; 167(5): 787 - 797.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
L. C. Grammer, K. E. Harris, and P. R. Yarnold
Effect of Respiratory Protective Devices on Development of Antibody and Occupational Asthma to an Acid Anhydride*
Chest, April 1, 2002; 121(4): 1317 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
E Meijer, D E Grobbee, and D Heederik
Detection of workers sensitised to high molecular weight allergens: a diagnostic study in laboratory animal workers
Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2002; 59(3): 189 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. HOUBA, D. HEEDERIK, and G. DOEKES
Wheat Sensitization and Work-related Symptoms in the Baking Industry Are Preventable . An Epidemiologic Study
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 1998; 158(5): 1499 - 1503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the European Respiratory Society.