ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russell, R.
Right arrow Articles by Helms, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Russell, R.
Right arrow Articles by Helms, P.
Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 2073-2076
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1994


Original Articles

Evaluation of three different techniques used to measure chest wall movements in children

RI Russell and PJ Helms

Several techniques exist for assessing chest wall movements in children, that incorporate different measurement principles. Although the output from such devices appears very similar, the comparability of data from different devices needs to be evaluated. We have investigated the simultaneous measurement of chest wall movement using three different devices in 12 children recovering from intensive care. The devices used were inductance plethysmography (assessing thoracic cross-sectional area), magnetometers (assessing thoracic diameter), and a Hall device strain guage (assessing thoracic circumference). Measurements of respiratory timing and of phase angle between rib cage and abdomen in these patients showed a close agreement between devices in ventilated patients. However, occasional inconsistencies occurred in patients who were breathing spontaneously. We suggest that it may not always be appropriate to directly compare data on chest wall movements in children recorded using different measurement techniques. The best method of measurement varies with the clinical picture.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ACCP Sleep Med Brd RevHome page
L. J. Brooks
Pediatric Sleep-Disordered Breathing
ACCP Sleep Med Brd Rev, January 1, 2009; 4(0): 239 - 248.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. de Groote, Y. Verbandt, M. Paiva, and P. Mathys
Measurement of thoracoabdominal asynchrony: importance of sensor sensitivity to cross section deformations
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2000; 88(4): 1295 - 1302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the European Respiratory Society.