ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wragg, S
Right arrow Articles by Moxham, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wragg, S
Right arrow Articles by Moxham, J
Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 1788-1792
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1994


Original Articles

Comparison of cervical magnetic stimulation and bilateral percutaneous electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerves in normal subjects

S Wragg, R Aquilina, J Moran, M Ridding, C Hamnegard, T Fearn, M Green, and J Moxham

Cervical magnetic stimulation is a new technique for stimulating the phrenic nerves, and may offer an alternative to percutaneous electrical stimulation for assessing diaphragmatic strength in normal subjects and patients in whom electrical stimulation is technically difficult or poorly tolerated. We compared cervical magnetic stimulation with conventional supramaximal bilateral percutaneous electrical stimulation in nine normal subjects. We measured oesophageal pressure (Poes), gastric pressure (Pgas) and transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi). The maximal relaxation rate (MRR) was also measured. The mean magnetic twitch Pdi was 36.5 cmH2O (range 27-48 cmH2O), significantly larger than electrical twitch Pdi, mean 29.7 cmH2O (range 22-40 cmH2O). The difference in twitch Pdi was explained entirely by twitch Poes, and it is possible that the magnetic technique stimulates some of the nerves to the upper chest wall muscles as well as the phrenic nerves. We compared bilateral, rectified, integrated, diaphragm surface electromyographic (EMG) responses in three subjects and found results within 10% in each subject, indicating similar diaphragmatic activation. The within occasion coefficient of variation, i.e. same subject/same session, was 6.7% both for magnetic and electrical twitch Pdi. The between occasion coefficient of variation, i.e. same subject/different days, was 6.6% for magnetic stimulation and 8.8% for electrical. There was no difference between relaxation rates measured with either technique. We conclude that magnetic stimulation is a reproducible and acceptable technique for stimulating the phrenic nerves, and that it provides a potentially useful alternative to conventional electrical stimulation as a nonvolitional test of diaphragm strength.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
W.D-C. Man, J. Moxham, and M.I. Polkey
Magnetic stimulation for the measurement of respiratory and skeletal muscle function
Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2004; 24(5): 846 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
T. M. Hemmerling and F. Donati
Neuromuscular blockade at the larynx, the diaphragm and the corrugator supercilii muscle: a review: [Blocage neuromusculaire du larynx, du diaphragme et du muscle sourcilier : une revue]
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2003; 50(8): 779 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
ATS/ERS Statement on Respiratory Muscle Testing
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2002; 166(4): 518 - 624.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S. Jonville, N. Delpech, and A. Denjean
Contribution of respiratory acidosis to diaphragmatic fatigue at exercise
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2002; 19(6): 1079 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. J. Mador, S. Khan, and T. J. Kufel
Bilateral Anterolateral Magnetic Stimulation of the Phrenic Nerves Can Detect Diaphragmatic Fatigue
Chest, February 1, 2002; 121(2): 452 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. A. Lyall, N. Donaldson, M. I. Polkey, P. N. Leigh, and J. Moxham
Respiratory muscle strength and ventilatory failure in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Brain, October 1, 2001; 124(10): 2000 - 2013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
G. F. RAFFERTY, M. LOU HARRIS, M. I. POLKEY, A. GREENOUGH, and J. MOXHAM
Effect of Hypercapnia on Maximal Voluntary Ventilation and Diaphragm Fatigue in Normal Humans
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 1999; 160(5): 1567 - 1571.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
Y M Luo, M I Polkey, R A Lyall, and J Moxham
Effect of brachial plexus co-activation on phrenic nerve conduction time
Thorax, September 1, 1999; 54(9): 765 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
Y. M. Luo, M. I. Polkey, L. C. Johnson, R. A. Lyall, M. L. Harris, M. Green, and J. Moxham
Diaphragm EMG measured by cervical magnetic and electrical phrenic nerve stimulation
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1998; 85(6): 2089 - 2099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. Similowski, C. Straus, V. Attali, A. Duguet, and J.-P. Derenne
Cervical magnetic stimulation as a method to discriminate between diaphragm and rib cage muscle fatigue
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 1998; 84(5): 1692 - 1700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
V. ATTALI, S. MEHIRI, C. STRAUS, F. SALACHAS, I. ARNULF, V. MEININGER, J.-P. DERENNE, and T. SIMILOWSKI
Influence of Neck Muscles on Mouth Pressure Response to Cervical Magnetic Stimulation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 1997; 156(2): 509 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. Similowski, S. Mehiri, A. Duguet, V. Attali, C. Straus, and J.-P. Derenne
Comparison of magnetic and electrical phrenic nerve stimulation in assessment of phrenic nerve conduction time
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 1997; 82(4): 1190 - 1199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the European Respiratory Society.