ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Comis, A
Right arrow Articles by Boner, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Comis, A
Right arrow Articles by Boner, A.
Eur Respir J 1993; 6: 523-526
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1993


Clinical Trial

Comparison of nedocromil sodium and sodium cromoglycate administered by pressurized aerosol, with and without a spacer device in exercise-induced asthma in children

A Comis, EA Valletta, L Sette, A Andreoli, and AL Boner

To compare the effectiveness of nedocromil sodium (NS) and sodium cromoglycate (SCG) administered by metered dose inhaler (MDI) in preventing exercise-induced asthma (EIA), 12 asthmatic children with EIA were studied in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study. NS and SCG were given by MDI alone, and by MDI with a 700 ml spacer device (Fisonair, Fisons, UK), in order to assess the benefit of using such a device. Following a baseline exercise challenge, the protective effect of NS, SCG or placebo was evaluated in each subject. The percentage fall in forced expiratory volume in one second, and percentage protection were measured. NS and SCG provided a significant and comparable protection from EIA, and both were better than placebo. No further improvement was observed after drug administration via the spacer. Both NS and SCG are effective in preventing EIA in children, when administered at the recommended clinical dose, and the use of a spacer for administering the drug provides no advantage if the technique of inhalation is good.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
K.D. Kelly, C.H. Spooner, and B.H. Rowe
Nedocromil sodium versus sodium cromoglycate in treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: a systematic review
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2001; 17(1): 39 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
A M Edwards, J Lyons, E Weinberg, F Weinberg, J D Gillies, G Reid, C F Robertson, P Robinson, M Dalton, P Van Asperen, et al.
Early use of inhaled nedocromil sodium in children following an acute episode of asthma
Thorax, April 1, 1999; 54(4): 308 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the European Respiratory Society.