ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keane, D
Right arrow Articles by McNicholas, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keane, D
Right arrow Articles by McNicholas, W.
Eur Respir J 1992; 5: 1123-1125
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1992


Clinical Trial

Comparison of nebulized and sprayed topical anaesthesia for fibreoptic bronchoscopy

D Keane and WT McNicholas

We compared the efficacy of nebulized (N) and sprayed (S) topical anaesthesia prior to fibreoptic bronchoscopy in a blinded study involving 54 patients aged 57 +/- 26 yrs (mean +/- SD). Cough frequency, recorded on cassette tape, was the index of efficacy. All patients received 100 mg lignocaine sprayed into the pharynx, or nebulized in random order prior to bronchoscopy, and all received intravenous diazepam sedation. Each patient received a further 100 mg of lignocaine solution through the bronchoscope onto the vocal cords and major airways during the procedure. No significant difference was found in overall cough frequency between N and S groups (8.7 +/- 6.9 coughs.min-1 N vs 10.5 +/- 6.0 S), and cough frequency was also similar between N and S during the periods above and below the vocal cords. Furthermore, no differences were found in cough frequency between N and S among smokers, patients with asthma and COPD, and patients who had a biopsy procedure, although a trend was seen in all comparisons towards a lower cough frequency with the nebulized route. Most patients in the S group found the spray unpleasant, whereas only one in the N group complained. We conclude that nebulized and sprayed lignocaine have similar efficacy as topical anaesthetics in fibreoptic bronchoscopy, but patient preference favours the nebulized route.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
D. Stolz, P. N. Chhajed, J. Leuppi, E. Pflimlin, and M. Tamm
Nebulized Lidocaine for Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1756 - 1760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C.M. Smyth and R.J. Stead
Survey of flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the United Kingdom
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2002; 19(3): 458 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
S. Putinati, L. Ballerin, L. Corbetta, L. Trevisani, and A. Potena
Patient Satisfaction With Conscious Sedation for Bronchoscopy
Chest, May 1, 1999; 115(5): 1437 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the European Respiratory Society.