ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jorres, R
Right arrow Articles by Magnussen, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jorres, R
Right arrow Articles by Magnussen, H
Eur Respir J 1992; 5: 936-944
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1992


Original Articles

Influence of short-term passive smoking on symptoms, lung mechanics and airway responsiveness in asthmatic subjects and healthy controls

R Jorres and H Magnussen

We studied the acute effect of passive smoking on symptoms, lung mechanics and airway responsiveness. Twenty four patients with mild to moderate bronchial asthma (11 male and 13 female; mean(SD) age 34(15) yrs; forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 91(17) % pred) were investigated. Sixteen of them had a history of passive smoke-induced respiratory symptoms. For comparison we studied 16 controls (7 male and 9 female; mean(SD) age 31(9) yrs; FEV1 106(13) % pred). On two different days, the subjects were exposed in an exposure chamber for one hour to either ambient air (Sham) or environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). During exposure to ETS, the mean concentrations of particles and CO were 3,095 micrograms.m-3 and 20.3 ppm, respectively. Before and immediately after exposure, symptoms and lung mechanics were assessed, followed by an inhalation challenge to determine the provocative concentrations of methacholine necessary to increase specific airway resistance (sRaw) by 100%, (PC100sRaw), and to decrease FEV1 by 20% (PC20FEV1). In the asthmatic subjects, during Sham exposure, mean (SEM) decrease of sRaw and FEV1 was 0.23(0.22) cmH2O.s and 0.04(0.03) l, respectively, (NS). During ETS, mean(SEM) decrease of sRaw and FEV1 was 0.55(0.46) cmH2O.s and 0.13(0.06) l, respectively. The significance of this decrease, however, disappeared when taking into account the individual variability of FEV1. Geometric mean(SEM) PC100sRaw and PC20FEV1 were 0.35(1.32) and 0.23(1.34) mg.ml-1 after Sham, and 0.34(1.37) and 0.28(1.36) mg.ml-1 after ETS, respectively, with no difference between the two study days. In the controls, the two exposure conditions did not exert any significant effects on sRaw, FEV1 and airway responsiveness.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. W. Gerbase, C. Schindler, J.-P. Zellweger, N. Kunzli, S. H. Downs, O. Brandli, J. Schwartz, M. Frey, L. Burdet, T. Rochat, et al.
Respiratory Effects of Environmental Tobacco Exposure Are Enhanced by Bronchial Hyperreactivity
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2006; 174(10): 1125 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
P. Witorsch
Review : Effects of Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure on Pulmonary Function and Respiratory Health in Adults: Update 1997
Indoor and Built Environment, January 1, 1998; 7(1): 4 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the European Respiratory Society.