Respiratory mechanics studied by multiple linear regression in unsedated ventilated patients

Respiratory mechanics during artificial ventilation are commonly studied with methods which require a specific respiratory pattern. An alternative is to analyse the relationship between tracheal pressure (P) and flow (V') by multiple linear regression (MLR) using a suitable model. The value of this approach was evaluated in 12 unsedated patients, mechanically-ventilated for acute respiratory failure, and most with a history of chronic obstructive or restrictive respiratory disease. After correction for the non-linear resistance of the endotracheal tube, the data were analysed with the linear first order model: P = P0 + E.V + R.V' where E and R are total respiratory elastance and resistance, and P0 is the static recoil pressure at end-expiration. After exclusion of the cycles which clearly exhibited muscular activity, a good fit was observed in 25 out of 36 records (relative root-mean-square error less than 10%); the values of E and R were reproducible within cycles, and consistent with the patient's condition and the ventilatory mode. The intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi), as derived from P0 and the applied PEEP, averaged 1.1 +/- 1.0 hPa. Using more sophisticated models, allowing for mechanical non-homogeneity or non-linearity of R or E, rarely improved the fit and often provided unrealistic data. In several subjects the discrepancy between the data and the first order model was consistent with expiratory flow limitation, which may severely impair the analysis. We conclude that, except in the case of expiratory flow limitation, the method is useful for routine clinical use and better implemented with the simple linear model.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. D. Macnaughton New ventilators for the ICU--usefulness of lung performance reporting Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2006; 97(1): 57 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Edibam, A. J. Rutten, D. V. Collins, and A. D. Bersten Effect of Inspiratory Flow Pattern and Inspiratory to Expiratory Ratio on Nonlinear Elastic Behavior in Patients with Acute Lung Injury Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2003; 167(5): 702 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. YOUNES, K. WEBSTER, J. KUN, D. ROBERTS, and B. MASIOWSKI A Method for Measuring Passive Elastance during Proportional Assist Ventilation Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2001; 164(1): 50 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. YOUNES, J. KUN, B. MASIOWSKI, K. WEBSTER, and D. ROBERTS A Method for Noninvasive Determination of Inspiratory Resistance during Proportional Assist Ventilation Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2001; 163(4): 829 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				V. Kessler, J. Guttmann, and C.J.L. Newth Dynamic respiratory system mechanics in infants during pressure and volume controlled ventilation Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2001; 17(1): 115 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Officer, R. Pellegrino, V. Brusasco, and J. R. Rodarte Measurement of pulmonary resistance and dynamic compliance with airway obstruction J Appl Physiol, November 1, 1998; 85(5): 1982 - 1988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. NIKISCHIN, T. GERHARDT, R. EVERETT, and E. BANCALARI A New Method to Analyze Lung Compliance When Pressure-Volume Relationship Is Nonlinear Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 1998; 158(4): 1052 - 1060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. G. Koulouris, I. Dimopoulou, P. Valta, R. Finkelstein, M. G. Cosio, and J. Milic-Emili Detection of expiratory flow limitation during exercise in COPD patients J Appl Physiol, March 1, 1997; 82(3): 723 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]