ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burke, W.
Right arrow Articles by et, al.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burke, W.
Right arrow Articles by et, al.
Eur Respir J 1992; 5: 780-784
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1992


Original Articles

Smoking-induced changes in epithelial lining fluid volume, cell density and protein

WM Burke, CM Roberts, DH Bryant, D Cairns, M Yeates, GW Morgan, BJ Martin, H Blake, R Penny, JJ Zaunders, and al. et

Bronchoalveolar lavage has proved a useful research technique for recovering cellular and molecular contents of the lower respiratory tract. Because the recovered fluid is variably diluted, an accurate estimation of molecular and cellular concentrations can only be made if the epithelial lining fluid volume recovered is also known. It has been suggested that smoking may alter epithelial lining fluid volume by reducing clearance or by stimulating production and, thus, affect the interpretation of bronchoalveolar lavage studies. In this study, urea was used as an endogenous marker of epithelial lining fluid volume in a comparison of 26 smokers and 31 nonsmokers. The mean epithelial lining fluid volume recovered from smokers was significantly greater than that of nonsmokers (2.4 +/- 1.40 ml vs 1.2 +/- 0.75 ml, p less than 0.005). The total cellular concentration in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in smokers was also greater (94.2 +/- 46 x 10(6) vs 33.9 +/- 21.5 x 10(6) cells per 300 ml lavage), even when corrected for bronchoalveolar lavage volume recovered (63.1 +/- 32.5 x 10(6) vs 24.9 +/- 13.3 x 10(6) cells per 100 ml recovered lavage fluid). This was true for macrophage, lymphocyte and neutrophil cell numbers. However, when corrected for the apparent epithelial lining fluid volume, only the macrophage count remained significantly higher in the smokers compared with nonsmokers (30.66 +/- 20.7 x 10(6) vs 18.21 +/- 8.6 x 10(6) macrophages.ml-1 ELF). In addition, concentrations of albumin and immunoglobulin M (IgM) were significantly lower in smokers after correction for epithelial lining fluid volume. These results highlight smoking as a confounding factor in the interpretation of bronchoalveolar lavage data.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. E. Conte Jr., J. A. Golden, M. McQuitty, J. Kipps, S. Duncan, E. McKenna, and E. Zurlinden
Effects of Gender, AIDS, and Acetylator Status on Intrapulmonary Concentrations of Isoniazid
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2002; 46(8): 2358 - 2364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
S. R Rutgers, D. S Postma, N. H T ten Hacken, H. F Kauffman, T. W van der Mark, G. H Koëter, and W. Timens
Ongoing airway inflammation in patients with COPD who do not currently smoke
Thorax, January 1, 2000; 55(1): 12 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the European Respiratory Society.