ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, S.
Right arrow Articles by Freed, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, S.
Right arrow Articles by Freed, A.
Eur Respir J 1992; 5: 707-711
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1992


Original Articles

No influence of airway heat flux on airflow-induced bronchospasm

SD Fuller and AN Freed

We used a canine model of airway reactivity to examine the role of airway heat flux in the response to dry air challenge. Airflow-induced bronchospasm (AIB) was assessed by measuring collateral system resistance (Rcs) with a wedged bronchoscope technique in anaesthetized mechanically ventilated dogs. We manipulate post-challenge airway heat flux by exposing peripheral airways to cool dry air (23.9 +/- 0.3 degrees C, 0.8 +/- 0.2 mgH2O.l-1), cool humid air (24.2 +/- 0.2 degrees C, 21.5 +/- 0.3 mgH2O.l-1), or warm humid air (35.3 +/- 0.4 degrees C, 40.6 +/- 0.3 mgH2O.l-1) during the recovery period (n = 14) following a high flow challenge (1,500 ml.min-1 for 2 min) with cool dry air. In a second series of experiments (n = 6), we attempted to further exaggerate airway heat flux during challenge by exposing peripheral airways to warm humid air during both baseline and recovery periods. In comparison to control (i.e. treatment with cool dry air before and after challenge), treatment with warm humid air during recovery period produced a small but significant attenuation (p less than 0.01) in Rcs. Cool humid air during recovery had no affect on Rcs following challenge. Warm humid air during both baseline and recovery tended to attenuate Rcs after challenge (p less than 0.05). We conclude that airway heat flux in itself has no significant physiological affect on AIB in the canine lung periphery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. N. Freed, Y. Wang, S. McCulloch, T. Myers, and R. Suzuki
Mucosal injury and eicosanoid kinetics during hyperventilation-induced bronchoconstriction
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 1999; 87(5): 1724 - 1733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the European Respiratory Society.