ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, M
Right arrow Articles by Shneerson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, M
Right arrow Articles by Shneerson, J.
Eur Respir J 1992; 5: 587-591
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1992


Original Articles

Inter-machine variability in the stability of continuous positive airway pressure

M Jackson, MA King, and JM Shneerson

Two studies were performed to investigate the differences in pressure stability performance of the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines used by our patients. The variations of mask pressures during each respiratory cycle were measured during overnight studies of two groups of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea, who were using either a Sleep-Easy III CPAP machine or a Si-Plan CPAP unit. The patients were well-matched for age, weight and neck circumference. The group using the Si-Plan unit had more constant mask pressures and were using lower CPAP pressures (mean 10.6 cmH2O) than those using the Sleep-Easy III machine (mean 13.8 cmH2O) (p less than 0.02). The pressure stability performance of five CPAP machines used by our patients was also compared using standardized simulated patient breaths produced by a negative pressure cuirass pump. There were large differences between the machines in ability to maintain a constant pressure. Using a tidal volume of 0.5 l and peak flow rates of between 20-40 l.min-1 the pressure variation ranged from 0-67% of the minimum inspiratory pressure. The maintenance of a constant pressure during inspiration and expiration lowers the mean pressure required to eliminate obstructive sleep apnoeas and reduces the likelihood of pressure related side-effects.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
R. Farre, J. M. Montserrat, E. Ballester, and D. Navajas
Potential Rebreathing After Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Failure During Sleep
Chest, January 1, 2002; 121(1): 196 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the European Respiratory Society.