ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cummin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cummin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, K.
Eur Respir J 1992; 5: 512-516
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1992


Original Articles

Ventilatory responsiveness to carbon dioxide below the normal control point in conscious normoxic humans

AR Cummin, VS Sidhu, RJ Telford, and KB Saunders

A recently developed CO2 pulse technique was used to test for ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 in four normal men following 2 min voluntary hyperventilation down to an end-tidal CO2 tension (PETCO2) of 20 mmHg (2.7 kPa). Pure CO2 was injected into the inspiratory limb of a breathing circuit at 0.4 l.min-1 for 30 s and any small ventilatory response was detected against background noise by ensemble-averaging of multiple runs. Following hyperventilation, ventilation was initially often above control and apnoea was not seen. In one subject, the ventilatory response to the CO2 pulse was barely detectable either before or after hyperventilation. In another subject, there was a response to pulses given before hyperventilation and 3 and 5.5 min after hyperventilation but not 30 s after hyperventilation when PETCO2 was about 25 mmHg (3.3 kPa) and rising. In the two remaining subjects ventilatory responses were seen to CO2 pulses started 30 s after hyperventilation, although PETCO2 following the pulse remained some 5 mmHg (0.7 kPa) below baseline. We conclude that in some subjects the PETCO2 threshold lies well below the normal PETCO2. The technique is tedious for the experimental subject because of the large number of repetitions required and, therefore, unsuitable for a study on a large number of subjects.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the European Respiratory Society.