ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peslin, R
Right arrow Articles by Duvivier, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peslin, R
Right arrow Articles by Duvivier, C
Eur Respir J 1992; 5: 86-92
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1992


Original Articles

Within-breath variations of forced oscillation resistance in healthy subjects

R Peslin, Y Ying, C Gallina, and C Duvivier

Respiratory resistance (Rrs) was measured by the forced oscillation technique at 10, 20 and 30 Hz in 54 healthy subjects. The sinusoidal pressure oscillations were applied around the head, rather than at the mouth, so as to minimize transmural pressure across extrathoracic airway walls and the corresponding artefact (Peslin et al., J Appl Physiol, 1985, 59, 1790-1795). The flow (V') and volume (V) dependences of Rrs during the respiratory cycle were analysed by least square regression according to: Rrs = K1 + 2.K2.[V']#- K3.V, where K1 and K2 are Rohrer's constants, and where K3 expresses the (negative) volume dependence of Rrs. The analysis was made separately on the inspiratory and expiratory phases. A good fit was usually found between the data and the model, with a root-mean-square error averaging 15% of the mean Rrs at 10 Hz. At all frequencies K2 and K3 were substantially and significantly larger, and K1 slightly lower during expiration than during inspiration. Rrs, K1 and K3 were minimum at 20 Hz, while K2 exhibited a strong positive frequency dependence. The decrease of Rrs from 10 to 20 Hz was entirely explained by the variations of its linear component, and its increase from 20 to 30 Hz was largely due to its flow dependent component. Both the phasic variations and the frequency dependence of the coefficients suggest that the model is purely descriptive and that coefficients K2 and K3 reflect a number of phenomena, including the variations in glottic aperture during the respiratory cycle.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. Diba, C. M. Salome, H. K. Reddel, C. W. Thorpe, B. Toelle, and G. G. King
Short-term variability of airway caliber--a marker of asthma?
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2007; 103(1): 296 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. W. Thorpe, C. M. Salome, N. Berend, and G. G. King
Modeling airway resistance dynamics after tidal and deep inspirations
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2004; 97(5): 1643 - 1653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. Pellegrino, R. Dellaca, P. T. Macklem, A. Aliverti, S. Bertini, P. Lotti, P. Agostoni, A. Locatelli, and V. Brusasco
Effects of rapid saline infusion on lung mechanics and airway responsiveness in humans
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2003; 95(2): 728 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the European Respiratory Society.