ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 14, 2006, 10.1183/09031936.06.00025506
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/4/703    most recent
09031936.06.00025506v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, C.
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, C.
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, L. J.
Eur Respir J 2006; 28:703-711
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2006

Regulation of airway smooth muscle RhoA/ROCK activities by cholinergic and bronchodilator stimuli

C. Liu, J. Zuo and L. J. Janssen

Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, St. Joseph's Hospital and the Dept of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

CORRESPONDENCE: L. J. Janssen, L-314, St. Joseph's Hospital, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 4A6, Canada. Fax: 1 9055406510. E-mail: janssenl{at}mcmaster.ca

Keywords: Adrenergic, airway smooth muscle, cholinergic, nitric oxide, RhoA, Rho kinase

Received: February 19, 2006
Accepted May 30, 2006

The current study set out to compare the temporal relationships of Rho activity, Rho kinase (ROCK) activity and tone following cholinergic stimulation in the presence and absence of three different bronchodilators.

Bovine trachea challenged with a half-maximally effective concentration of carbachol (CCh) was flash-frozen at different times, then assayed for Rho (rhotekin pull-down assay) and ROCK (Western blot; radiometric assay) activities.

Rho was activated within 30 s, followed by ROCK (peak at 2 min); both returned to baseline by 20 min, although tone continued to rise over that period. Increasing the concentration of CCh greatly increased the magnitudes and rates of stimulation of Rho, ROCK and tone. These CCh-induced changes were next compared in tissues pre-treated with isoproterenol, salmeterol or the nitric oxide donor S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP). Neither the time course nor the magnitude of Rho-activation were reduced by the ß-agonists; SNAP slowed Rho activation but it did not alter the peak magnitude. These observations were mirrored in ROCK activation and contraction. When tissues were pre-constricted with CCh and then challenged with the bronchodilators, however, all three agonists reversed cholinergically stimulated Rho, ROCK and myosin light chain kinase activities as well as tone.

In conclusion, bronchodilators can suppress RhoA and Rho kinase activities, although their major effect appears to be on myosin light chain kinase activity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ther Adv Respir DisHome page
M. Baroffio, E. Crimi, and V. Brusasco
Review: Airway smooth muscle as a model for new investigative drugs in asthma
Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 129 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
W. T. Gerthoffer
Migration of Airway Smooth Muscle Cells
Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2008; 5(1): 97 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J. P. T. Ward
On Ca2+ sensitivity and the airways: not just any smooth muscle
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2006; 28(4): 680 - 682.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the European Respiratory Society.