ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Schil, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Schil, P.
Eur Respir J 2003; 22:735-738
Copyright ©ERS Journals Ltd 2003


Cost analysis of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy: critical review

P. Van Schil

CORRESPONDENCE: P. Van Schil, Dept of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium. Fax: 32 38214396. E-mail: paul.van.schil@uza.be

Keywords: cost, evidence-based medicine, review, thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, video-assisted thoracic surgery

Received: May 24, 2003
Accepted July 1, 2003

Cost containment has become an important issue in thoracic surgery. Applying the principles of evidence-based medicine a literature search was performed to determine whether video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has an advantage over thoracotomy concerning total cost.

Only eight studies specifically looked at cost; all but one were retrospective. Lung biopsy by VATS yielded higher operating room costs compared with limited thoracotomy. The cost of VATS wedge resection of lung nodules was competitive with open techniques. In a prospective study regarding the treatment of pneumothorax by VATS, no advantages were demonstrated compared with axillary minithoracotomy. In two retrospective studies the total economic cost of VATS was lower but not all relevant factors were considered. Lung volume reduction surgery by VATS had a lower total inpatient cost compared with sternotomy but no specific details were provided. Finally, VATS treatment of lung cancer yielded conflicting results regarding total hospital charges.

From these studies it is clear that video-assisted thoracic surgery has a higher initial cost. Whether this is offset by a more rapid discharge remains to be proven. There is a definite need for high-quality prospective randomised studies.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
M. Salati, A. Brunelli, F. Xiume, M. Refai, V. Sciarra, A. Soccetti, and A. Sabbatini
Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: clinical and economic analysis in comparison to the traditional approach
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2008; 7(1): 63 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J-M. Tschopp, R. Rami-Porta, M. Noppen, and P. Astoul
Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: state of the art.
Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2006; 28(3): 637 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the European Respiratory Society.