|
|
||||||||
1 Servicio de Neumología, Hospital de Cruces, Bilbao, 2 Servei de Pneumología i Allèrgia Respiratoria, Institut Clínic de Pneumologia i Cirurgía Torácica, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, 3 Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Respiratorios, Hospital Clínico, Valencia, 4 Servicio de Neumología, Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, 5 Sección de Neumología, Hospital Mutua Terrassa, Barcelona, 6 Servicio de Neumología, Hospital La Fé, Valencia, 7 Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Dr Peset, Valencia, and 8 Sección de Neumología, Hospital San Jorge, Huesca, Spain
CORRESPONDENCE: TorresR. Zalacain, Secretaría SEPAR (Area TIR), Balmes 68 Pral, 08007, Barcelona, Spain. Fax: 34 934878509. E-mail: ssepar@separ.es
Keywords: aetiology, clinical characteristics, community-acquired pneumonia, elderly, prognostic factors
Received: July 17, 2002
Accepted October 15, 2002
This study was sponsored by the "Area de Tuberculosis e Infecciones Respiratorias (TIR)", Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR) and Aventis.
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the elderly has increased as a consequence of an overall increase of the elderly population. A controversy about the aetiology and outcome of CAP in this population still exists and more epidemiological studies are needed.
A prospective, 12-month, multicentre study was carried out to assess the clinical characteristics, aetiology, evolution and prognostic factors of elderly patients (
The clinical picture lasted
The results of this study may aid in the management of empiric antibiotic treatment in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia and the patients who have a greater probability of bad evolution may be identified based on the risk factors.
65 yrs) admitted to hospital for CAP. The study included 503 patients (age 76±7 yrs).
5 days in 318 (63%) and the main clinical features were cough (n=407, 81%) and fever (n=380, 76%). Aetiological diagnosis was achieved in 199 (40%) cases, with a definite diagnosis obtained in 164 (33%). Of the 223 microorganisms isolated the main agents found were Streptococcus pneumoniae in 98 (49%) and Haemophilus influenzae in 27 (14%). A total of 53 patients died (11%) and the multivariate analysis showed the following factors of bad prognosis: previous bed confinement, alteration in mental status, absence of chills, plasma creatinine
1.4 mg·dL1, oxygen tension in arterial blood/inspiratory oxygen fraction ratio <200 at the time of admission, and shock and renal failure during the evolution.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Kothe, T. Bauer, R. Marre, N. Suttorp, T. Welte, K. Dalhoff, and the Competence Network for Community-Acquired Pneu Outcome of community-acquired pneumonia: influence of age, residence status and antimicrobial treatment Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2008; 32(1): 139 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Valencia, J. R. Badia, M. Cavalcanti, M. Ferrer, C. Agusti, J. Angrill, E. Garcia, J. Mensa, M. S. Niederman, and A. Torres Pneumonia Severity Index Class V Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Characteristics, Outcomes, and Value of Severity Scores Chest, August 1, 2007; 132(2): 515 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Falguera, R. Pifarre, A. Martin, A. Sheikh, and A. Moreno Etiology and Outcome of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5): 3233 - 3239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Waterer, L. A. Kessler, and R. G. Wunderink Medium-Term Survival after Hospitalization with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2004; 169(8): 910 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |