ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chung, K.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chung, K.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P.
Eur Respir J 1989; 2: 763-768
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1989


Clinical Trial

Effect of theophylline on airway responses to inhaled platelet-activating factor in man

KF Chung, JW Lammers, M McCusker, NM Roberts, GM Nichol, and PJ Barnes

It has been suggested that theophylline may possess anti-inflammatory actions which underlie its antiasthma properties. We examined whether theophylline could inhibit the bronchoconstriction and the bronchial hyperresponsiveness induced by inhaled platelet-activating factor (PAF) in eight nonasthmatic subjects in a double-blind, cross-over study. After oral theophylline (6 mg.kg-1), plasma theophylline at 1 h was 10.4 +/- 1.8 mg.ml-1 (mean +/- SEM) compared to 0.39 +/- 0.19 mg.ml-1 on the placebo day (p less than 0.005). PAF, inhaled in five successive doses every 15 min, caused a 56 +/- 11% fall in Vp30 (flow at 30% of vital capacity from a partial expiratory manoeuvre) after the first dose at 5 min, and diminishing responses with successive doses. Theophylline had no significant effect on PAF-induced bronchoconstriction. PAF caused a significant decrease in PC40 (the concentration of methacholine needed to cause 40% fall in baseline Vp30) from a baseline of 12.8 mg.ml-1 (geometric standard error of mean (GSEM) 1.98) to 7.9 (1.79) mg.ml-1 on day 3 and 6.9 (1.74) on day 7 (p less than 0.02). There was no significant difference when mean PC40 values on corresponding days after PAF were compared between placebo and theophylline treatment periods. Our results suggest that theophylline has negligible influence on the airway effects of PAF.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the European Respiratory Society.