ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caire, N
Right arrow Articles by Malo, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caire, N
Right arrow Articles by Malo, J.
Eur Respir J 1989; 2: 741-745
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1989


Clinical Trial

Influence of the duration of inhalation of cold dry air on the resulting bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects

N Caire, A Cartier, H Ghezzo, and JL Malo

Hyperventilation of cold dry air causes bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects and has been proposed as a test for assessing bronchial hyperresponsiveness. The influence of the duration of inhalation of unconditioned cold air has not been studied. We have investigated the question in 12 asthmatic subjects in a clinically stable state. Each subject underwent three inhalation tests at a maximum interval of two weeks. On each day, the duration of inhalation was different, being randomly 2, 3 or 4 min depending on the subject. Doubling doses of cold air produced by a freon conditioner were administered, increasing ventilation from 7.5 to 15, 30, 60 l.min-1 and maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV). Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was assessed after each period of cold air inhalation. The test was stopped when the FEV1 had decreased by 20% or more, or when MVV had been achieved. The dose of cold air expressed as the level of ventilation causing a 20% change in FEV1 (PD20) was interpolated from individual dose-response curves. Dose-response curves shifted to the left when the duration of ventilation was increased. PD20 was significantly lower after 3 min of ventilation than after 2 min (mean +/- SD PD20 of 41.7 +/- 1.4 l.min-1 compared with 53.3 +/- 1.2 l.min-1; p = 0.002). There was a further fall in PD20 after 4 min of ventilation (PD20 = 36.1 +/- 1.5 l.min-1) but the difference compared with the values obtained after 3 min was not significant (p = 0.09), thus suggesting a plateau.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the European Respiratory Society.