ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pride, N.
Right arrow Articles by Allegra, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pride, N.
Right arrow Articles by Allegra, L
Eur Respir J 1989; 2: 702-709
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1989


Original Articles

Diagnostic labels applied to model case histories of chronic airflow obstruction. Responses to a questionnaire in 11 North American and Western European countries

NB Pride, P Vermeire, and L Allegra

In Canada, USA and 9 Western European Countries, 121 respiratory physicians responded to an English language questionnaire asking them to state how they would investigate, treat and label four model patients, chosen to represent well-recognized patterns of clinical features of chronic airflow obstruction. Selection of further investigations appeared to be determined more by the probable diagnostic label than by the need to define selected characteristics in the whole range of such patients. Differences in recommended treatment between countries were less than others have reported for the treatment of asthma. Analysis of the diagnostic labels showed: the classic terms asthma, chronic bronchitis, emphysema still predominated in clinical practice and were considered to be better defined entities than any of the many terms introduced to describe chronic airflow obstruction in the last 30 yrs; the term chronic bronchitis was a source of confusion unless qualified to indicate presence or absence of obstruction; the use of combination terms such as chronic asthmatic bronchitis and chronic obstructive bronchitis showed large differences between countries; there were few differences related to national language. The implications of these findings are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
C E Ruse and S G Parker
Genetics and the Dutch Hypothesis
Chronic Respiratory Disease, April 1, 2004; 1(2): 105 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. B. Soriano, K. J. Davis, B. Coleman, G. Visick, D. Mannino, and N. B. Pride
The Proportional Venn Diagram of Obstructive Lung Disease: Two Approximations From the United States and the United Kingdom
Chest, August 1, 2003; 124(2): 474 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. A. PAUWELS, A. S. BUIST, P. M. A. CALVERLEY, C. R. JENKINS, and S. S. HURD
Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease . NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop Summary
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2001; 163(5): 1256 - 1276.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
P. L P BRAND
Asthma---time for a change of name?
Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 1998; 78(2): 194c - 194.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the European Respiratory Society.