ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, S
Eur Respir J 1989; 2: 637-639
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1989


Clinical Trial

Optimal inhalation technique with terbutaline Turbuhaler

OR Hansen and S Pedersen

The bronchodilator response after four different modes of inhalation of 0.25 mg terbutaline from a Turbuhaler was assessed, in a double-blind cross-over study, of 14 asthmatic children aged 8-14 yrs (mean 11.6 yrs). The children inhaled as fast as possible (mean peak inspiratory flow rate = 53 l.min-1), because fast inhalations have been found to be more efficient than slow inhalations when the Turbuhaler is used. Tilting the head back during inhalation and a breath-holding pause of 10 s after the inhalation had no significant effect upon bronchodilation. Furthermore, the response was the same whether the children inhaled from residual volume (RV) or functional residual capacity (FRC). These results suggest that this new inhaler can be used with a very simple inhalation technique without any loss of effect. A simple inhalation technique is likely to facilitate teaching and improve compliance.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ERRHome page
K. R. Chapman, T. H. Voshaar, and J. C. Virchow
Inhaler choice in primary practice
Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2005; 14(96): 117 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
Inhalation devices
Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 13, 2005; 173(6_suppl): S39 - S45.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
S Drblik, G Lapierre, R Thivierge, J Turgeon, P Gaudreault, B Cummins-McManus, I Verdy, J Haddon, J Lee, and S Spier
Comparative efficacy of terbutaline sulphate delivered by Turbuhaler dry powder inhaler or pressurised metered dose inhaler with Nebuhaler spacer in children during an acute asthmatic episode
Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2003; 88(4): 319 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
S. Epstein, A. Maidenberg, D. Hallett, K. Khan, and K. R. Chapman
Patient Handling of a Dry-Powder Inhaler in Clinical Practice
Chest, November 1, 2001; 120(5): 1480 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
Inhalation devices and propellants
Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 1, 1999; 161(90111): s44 - 50.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the European Respiratory Society.