ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arvidsson, P
Right arrow Articles by Svedmyr, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arvidsson, P
Right arrow Articles by Svedmyr, N
Eur Respir J 1989; 2: 325-330
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1989


Clinical Trial

Formoterol, a new long-acting bronchodilator for inhalation

P Arvidsson, S Larsson, CG Lofdahl, B Melander, L Wahlander, and N Svedmyr

The aim of this study was to evaluate if treatment with inhaled formoterol is appreciated by asthmatics and whether it causes tachyphylaxis. Twenty stable asthmatics were included in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. They were treated for two weeks either with formoterol or salbutamol, with one week washout inbetween. They were given 12 micrograms formoterol or 200 micrograms salbutamol twice daily and instructed to use additional spray doses on demand. On a diary card they recorded the number of doses, asthma symptoms and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) before every dose. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) dose-response curves for salbutamol (total dose 1.3 mg) were performed before and after each treatment period to evaluate development of tachyphylaxis. There was a significant difference in favour of formoterol concerning symptoms, PEFR recordings, spray consumption, and preference. Fifteen patients preferred formoterol and two salbutamol. The dose-response curves before formoterol and before, as well as after salbutamol were almost identical. After formoterol the curve had changed; both basal and maximum values were higher than before. Thus, no evidence of tachyphylaxis was found, compared to the ordinary beta-stimulant treatment.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P.W. Ind, C. Villasante, R.J. Shiner, A. Pietinalho, N.G. Boszormenyi, S. Soliman, and O. Selroos
Safety of formoterol by Turbuhaler(R) as reliever medication compared with terbutaline in moderate asthma
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2002; 20(4): 859 - 866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. WALLIN, T. SANDSTRÖM, M. SÖDERBERG, P. HOWARTH, B. LUNDBÄCK, G. DELLA-CIOPPA, S. WILSON, M. JUDD, S. HOLGATE, A. LINDBERG, et al.
The Effects of Regular Inhaled Formoterol, Budesonide, and Placebo on Mucosal Inflammation and Clinical Indices in Mild Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 1999; 159(1): 79 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the European Respiratory Society.