ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Namsirikul, P
Right arrow Articles by Bamberg, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Namsirikul, P
Right arrow Articles by Bamberg, P
Eur Respir J 1989; 2: 317-324
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1989


Clinical Trial

Comparison of inhaled budesonide with oral prednisolone at two dose-levels commonly used for the treatment of moderate asthma

P Namsirikul, S Chaisupamongkollarp, N Chantadisai, and P Bamberg

The purpose of the study was to compare the anti-asthmatic efficacy of two doses of inhaled budesonide with two doses of oral prednisolone commonly used in clinical practice. The patients studied had not been taking regular inhaled glucocorticosteroids and so there was minimal interference from previous medication. The study was conducted as two double-blind crossovers with a washout period between them - firstly, comparing 400 micrograms budesonide with 5 mg prednisolone per day and secondly, 800 micrograms budesonide with 10 mg prednisolone per day. Lung function and symptoms were improved significantly from run-in by all treatments and improvement on both drugs was dose-dependent. When low-dose treatments were compared, mean morning peak expiratory flow rate was higher during budesonide treatment and, as a result, diurnal variation was significantly less than that during prednisolone treatment. At the higher doses, differences between the drugs were not observed, but this may have been due to the fact that a "ceiling effect" had been reached.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the European Respiratory Society.