ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Navajas, D
Right arrow Articles by Canet, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Navajas, D
Right arrow Articles by Canet, J
Eur Respir J 1989; 2: 178-184
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1989


Original Articles

Recording pressure at the distal end of the endotracheal tube to measure respiratory impedance

D Navajas, R Farre, M Rotger, and J Canet

To minimize the flow-dependent effects caused by an endotracheal tube during impedance measurements, we recorded pressure inside the tube at its distal end. We used a commercial endotracheal tube with a lumen built into its wall with the opening located near the outlet of the tube. We characterized the effect of the tube by means of an effective transfer function (H). We measured H from 0.25-32 Hz on a mechanical analogue by using pseudorandom excitation with different peak-to-peak flow amplitudes (Vpp). For an 8 mm internal diameter (ID) endotracheal tube the modulus of H measured with Vpp 0.2 l.s-1 was 1.00 at 0.25 Hz and increased with the frequency to 1.40 at 32 Hz. The phase factor was close to zero (less than 5 degrees) over the whole frequency band. The modulus of H changed less than 5% and the phase factor less than 3 degrees when Vpp was increased from 0.2 to 0.8 l.s-1. We evaluated the method on five mechanical analogues with increased resistance or elastance and with a different tracheal area. The mean normalized distance in the complex plane over the whole frequency band (dz) between the analogue impedance and the estimated value from intubation was always less than 5%. Finally, the method was tested on an active analogue which superimposed a high-amplitude (up to 1.4 l.s-1 peak-to-peak) low-frequency (0.25 or 0.33 Hz) sinusoidal flow onto excitation: dz was always less than 4.3%.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the European Respiratory Society.