ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, S.
Eur Respir J 1989; 2: 36-43
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1989


Original Articles

A comparison between the airway response to isocapnic hyperventilation and hypertonic saline in subjects with asthma

CM Smith and SD Anderson

We compared the response to isocapnic hyperventilation (ISH), where both cooling and drying of the mucosa occur, with the response to inhaling aerosols of hypertonic saline (HS), where airway osmolarity increases without airway cooling. We studied nine subjects on two days. For ISH, subjects ventilated at 70% of their estimated maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV). For HS, they inhaled aerosols of 2.7, 3.6, or 4.5% saline. The concentration that was used depended on the rate of ventilation during ISH. For both challenges the stimulus was given for one minute. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was measured once between each minute, and the challenge ceased when the FEV1 did not change for two successive minutes. A plateau in FEV1 occurred after 8.1 +/- 2.4 (mean +/- 1 SD) min of ISH, and 8.3 +/- 2.4 min of HS. The lowest FEV1 (% predicted) after ISH was 45 +/- 16% and after HS was 51 +/- 18% (r = 0.93). However, the maximum responses occurred after the final challenge and were not the same as the plateau. For HS, the plateau represented 89 +/- 11% of the maximum response which developed within one minute of the final challenge. For ISH, the plateau was only 56 +/- 26% of the maximum response, which developed within 5.2 +/- 2.9 min after challenge. The similarities in the response to these challenges are consistent with the hypothesis that ISH induces asthma via hyperosmolarity. The delayed response to ISH suggests that cooling may delay the response to hyperosmolarity.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. Suzuki and A. N. Freed
Hypertonic saline aerosol increases airway reactivity in the canine lung periphery
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2000; 89(6): 2139 - 2146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. D. BRANNAN, H. KOSKELA, S. D. ANDERSON, and N. CHEW
Responsiveness to Mannitol in Asthmatic Subjects with Exercise- and Hyperventilation-induced Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 1998; 158(4): 1120 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. T. de la FUENTE, M. ROMAGNOLI, P. GODARD, J. BOUSQUET, and P. CHANEZ
Safety of Inducing Sputum in Patients with Asthma of Varying Severity
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 1998; 157(4): 1127 - 1130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the European Respiratory Society.