ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vlachos-Mayer, H
Right arrow Articles by Hargreave, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vlachos-Mayer, H
Right arrow Articles by Hargreave, F.
Eur Respir J 2000; 16: 997-1000
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 2000


Original Articles

Success and safety of sputum induction in the clinical setting

H Vlachos-Mayer, R Leigh, RF Sharon, P Hussack, and FE Hargreave

It has previously been reported that sputum induction is successful and safe in the clinical research setting. The authors examined the success and safety of sputum induction in routine clinical practice in patients with asthma or chronic airflow limitation of varying severity. Records of 304 patients with asthma and 25 with smoking related chronic airflow limitation were examined retrospectively. All had sputum induced as part of their routine clinical evaluation. When the baseline post salbutamol forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was > or =70% predicted, the inductions consisted of inhalation of an aerosol of 3%, 4% and 5% saline, each given for 7 min. If the FEV1 was <70%, or there were other reasons for concern, the inductions were initiated with normal saline for shorter periods. Inhalations were discontinued when sputum was obtained or when there was a fall in FEV1 > or =20%. Success was identified by obtaining nonsquamous total and differential cell counts containing macrophages, and safety by the fall in FEV1. The overall success was 93%. The procedure was safe even amongst patients with an FEV1 of <60% and <1 L. Of 77 patients with an FEV1 between 40-59%, 8% fell by > or =20% and of 35 patients with an FEV1 <40%, 6% fell by 20%. Carefully standardized sputum induction can be successful and safe in patients with asthma or chronic airflow limitation in clinical practice, even when moderate or severe airflow limitation is present.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
C. Carlsten, M. L. Aitken, and T. S. Hallstrand
Safety of Sputum Induction With Hypertonic Saline Solution in Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction
Chest, May 1, 2007; 131(5): 1339 - 1344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
E. Bathoorn, J. Liesker, D. Postma, G. Koeter, A. J. M. van Oosterhout, and H. A. M. Kerstjens
Safety of Sputum Induction During Exacerbations of COPD
Chest, February 1, 2007; 131(2): 432 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
R.O. Crapo, R.L. Jensen, and F.E. Hargreave
Airway inflammation in COPD: physiological outcome measures and induced sputum
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2003; 21(41_suppl): 19S - 28s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
L.-P. Boulet, V. Boulet, and J. Milot
How Should We Quantify Asthma Control?: A Proposal
Chest, December 1, 2002; 122(6): 2217 - 2223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
Leader of the Working Group: E. Pizzichini, Members of the Working Group:, M.M.M. Pizzichini, R. Leigh, R. Djukanovic, and P.J. Sterk
Safety of sputum induction
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2002; 20(37_suppl): 9S - 18s.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M.M. Kelly, R. Leigh, S. Carruthers, P. Horsewood, G.J. Gleich, F.E. Hargreave, and G. Cox
Increased detection of interleukin-;5 in sputum by addition of protease inhibitors
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2001; 18(4): 685 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the European Respiratory Society.