ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yan, S
Right arrow Articles by Sliwinski, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yan, S
Right arrow Articles by Sliwinski, P
Eur Respir J 2000; 16: 684-690
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 2000


Original Articles

Expiratory muscle pressure and breathing mechanics in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

S Yan, C Sinderby, P Bielen, J Beck, N Comtois, and P Sliwinski

Expiratory muscle recruitment is common in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Due to airway obstruction, there is little reason to believe that active expiration in COPD would be mechanically effective in lowering operating lung volume. The physiological significance of expiratory muscle recruitment in COPD, therefore, remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess, in COPD patients breathing at rest, the effect of expiratory muscle contraction on force generating ability of the diaphragm. The force generating ability of the diaphragm was evaluated from its pressure swing (Pdi) for a given diaphragm electrical activity (Edi), where Edi was normalized as % of its maximal value (Pdi/Edi/Edi,max). Phasic expiratory muscle contraction was measured as the total expiratory rise in gastric pressure (Pga,exp.rise). Nineteen seated patients with moderate to severe COPD, participated in the study and 10 exhibited phasic rise in Pga during expiration with a mean Pga,exp.rise of 1.91+/-0.89 cmH2O. The patients were thus divided into passive expiration (PE) and active expiration (AE) groups. There was no significant difference in various lung function and breathing pattern parameters between the two groups. Pdi/Edi/Edi,max was 0.63+/-0.07 and 0.54+/-0.07 cmH2O/% in PE and AE groups, respectively, and was not significantly different between each other. Compared with PE group, AE group not only recruited expiratory muscles, but also preferentially recruited inspiratory rib cage muscles and derecruited the diaphragm. The results do not support a significant improvement of the force-generating ability of the diaphragm by phasic contraction of expiratory muscles at rest in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. Parthasarathy, A. Jubran, F. Laghi, and M. J. Tobin
Sternomastoid, rib cage, and expiratory muscle activity during weaning failure
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2007; 103(1): 140 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
F. Laghi and M. J. Tobin
Disorders of the Respiratory Muscles
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2003; 168(1): 10 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the European Respiratory Society.