ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barbato, A
Right arrow Articles by Zach, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barbato, A
Right arrow Articles by Zach, M
Eur Respir J 2000; 16: 509-513
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 2000


Original Articles

Interstitial lung disease in children: a multicentre survey on diagnostic approach

A Barbato, C Panizzolo, A Cracco, J de Blic, R Dinwiddie, and M Zach

Chronic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a rare disorder in the paediatric age group, with a poor prognosis. The diagnostic approach to ILD is based on more or less invasive methods. This study was implemented to verify which methods are the most often used in children. Questionnaires (333) were sent to members of the European Respiratory Society Paediatric Assembly belonging to 187 European and non-European centres. Questions concerned the use of noninvasive diagnostic methods, e.g. history taking, physical examination, routine laboratory tests, respiratory function tests and radiology (chest radiography, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT)), and the use of invasive techniques such as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), transbronchial biopsy (TBB), open lung biopsy (OLB), video-assisted thoracoscopic biopsy (VAT) and HRCT with fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Thirty eight centres returned the questionnaires and 131 children with ILD were studied. A diagnosis of ILD was achieved in five (3.8%) patients using noninvasive techniques alone. Using the various biopsy methods, histological assessment was performed on a total of 98 (74.8%) children. The most frequently used invasive technique both alone and in combination was BAL (83, 63.3%), followed by OLB (64, 48.8%), TBB (26, 19.8%) and VAT (11, 8.4%); FNAB was used in one patient. In conclusion a diagnosis of interstitial lung disease was reached on the basis of aetiological and/or histological findings in 117 (89%) of the 131 patients studied.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Vrielynck, T. Mamou-Mani, S. Emond, P. Scheinmann, F. Brunelle, and J. de Blic
Diagnostic Value of High-Resolution CT in the Evaluation of Chronic Infiltrative Lung Disease in Children
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 914 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. Bush
Update in Pediatric Lung Disease 2007
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2008; 177(7): 686 - 695.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A. Bush
Paediatric interstitial lung disease: not just kid's stuff
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2004; 24(4): 521 - 523.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the European Respiratory Society.